Home

Jacksonville District

Run scraper

Escambia County Board of County Commissioners - Artificial Reef

Basic information

Fill out these two fields at minimum.

— or —

How Big?

Where?

Links to source documents

Raw text

You can copy from here when filling out the rest of the page.

Escambia County, Escambia County Board of County Commissioners. Pensacola, Florida. PROJECT PURPOSE: Basic: Artificial Reef. Overall: Establish a network of artificial reefs off of Casino Beach in the Gulf of Mexico to provide reef habitat and recreational fishing opportunities.

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: The Jacksonville District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) has received an application for a Department of the Army permit pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. §1344) and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. §403)as described below:

APPLICANT: Escambia County Board of County Commissioners

Marine Resources Division

3360 West Park Place

Pensacola, Florida 32502

WATERWAY AND LOCATION: The proposed deployment site is located in the Gulf of Mexico adjacent to the Pensacola Beach Fishing Pier, approximately 540 feet south of the existing Casino Beach public access, within Escambia County, Florida.

APPROXIMATE COORDINATES:

Corner Latitude Longitude

Northwest 30.32860° -87.14271°

Northeast 30.32890° -87.14084°

Southeast 30.32647°-87.14031°

Southwest 30.32617° -87.14220°

PROJECT PURPOSE:

Basic: Artificial Reef.

Overall: Establish a network of artificial reefs off of Casino Beach in the Gulf of Mexico to provide reef habitat and recreational fishing opportunities.

EXISTING CONDITIONS: The proposed artificial reef site would be located in the Gulf of Mexico, approximately 540 feet south of the existing Casino Beach public access in Escambia County. The habitat within the proposed artificial reef site contains medium to coarse grained sands, predominately unvegetated with a surficial layer of microalgae/cyanobacteria. There is no submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV’s) located within the reef deployment site. Additionally, there are no natural rock outcrops or hard bottom formations within the deployment site. The water depth within the proposed project area ranges from approximately 10 feet to 25 feet NAVD 1988.

PROPOSED WORK: The applicant seeks to establish a 600-foot by 900-foot artificial reef deployment area, which would be referred to as the Pensacola Beach Fishing Pier Habitat Enhancement Artificial Reef Site. Specifically, the applicant proposes to create six (6) 20 feet by 20 feet patch reefs, approximately 23 feet east and west of the existing pier. Each patch reef would be comprised of Class II size stone or equivalent. The proposed vertical relief for each patch reef would be approximately 4 feet. above the Gulf bottom. Additionally, four (4) pile supported multi-media reef modules (i.e. Walter Eco-Systems Reef Modules or similar pre-fabricated units) are proposed to be installed, beginning approximately 340 feet southeast of the southeast corner of the terminal platform of the Pensacola Beach Fishing Pier. The pre-fabricated reef modules consists of a stack of concrete disks embedded with limestone rock, approximately 5 feet in diameter, with a center support pile that extends into the Gulf bottom to ensure modules remain firmly in place and do not subside. The four reef modules would be oriented in a southeasterly direction and spaced approximately 50 feet on center. Both the patch reefs and reef modules would be deployed a minimum of 50 feet inside the proposed reef deployment boundary. The proposed reefs would be placed so that the top of each reef does not exceed 1/2 distance from the bottom of the surface of the water at mean low tide.

AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION INFORMATION: The applicant has provided the following information in support of efforts to avoid and/or minimize impacts to the aquatic environment:

The applicant selected a site that is devoid of submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV’s) and where there are no natural rock outcrops or hard bottom formations.

COMPENSATORY MITIGATION: The applicant has offered the following compensatory mitigation plan to offset unavoidable functional loss to the aquatic environment:

No compensatory mitigation is proposed.

CULTURAL RESOURCES: The Corps is not aware of any known historic properties within the permit area. By copy of this public notice, the Corps is providing information for review. Our final determination relative to historic resource impacts is subject to review by and coordination with the State Historic Preservation Officer and those federally recognized tribes with concerns in Florida and the Permit Area.

ENDANGERED SPECIES: The Corps has determined the proposed project may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect, Gulf Sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus desotoi) and its designated critical habitat (Unit 11), smalltooth sawfish (Pristis pectinata) and the following species of swimming sea turtles: green turtle (Chelonia mydas), hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricate), Kemp’s ridley turtle (Lepidochelys kempii), leatherback turtle (Dermochelys coriacea), loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta). The Corps will request National Marine Fisheries Service concurrence with this determination pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act.

ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT (EFH): This notice initiates consultation with the National Marine Fisheries Service on EFH as required by the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 1996. The proposal would impact unvegetated bottom in the nearshore waters of the Gulf of Mexico and may be utilized by various life stages of species within the following Fisheries Managements Plans (Shrimp, Reef Fish, Stone Crab and Coastal Migratory Pelagics). Our initial determination is that the proposed action would not have a substantial adverse impact on EFH or Federally managed fisheries in the Gulf of Mexico. Our final determination relative to project impacts and the need for mitigation measures is subject to review by and coordination with the National Marine Fisheries Service.

NOTE: This public notice is being issued based on information furnished by the applicant. This information has not been verified or evaluated to ensure compliance with laws and regulation governing the regulatory program. The jurisdictional line has not been verified by Corps personnel.

AUTHORIZATION FROM OTHER AGENCIES: Water Quality Certification may be required from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and/or one of the state Water Management Districts.

COMMENTS regarding the potential authorization of the work proposed should be submitted in writing to the attention of the District Engineer through the Pensacola Permits Section, 41 North Jefferson Street, Suite 301, Pensacola, Florida 32502, within 30 days from the date of this notice.

The decision whether to issue or deny this permit application will be based on the information received from this public notice and the evaluation of the probable impact to the associated wetlands. This is based on an analysis of the applicant's avoidance and minimization efforts for the project, as well as the compensatory mitigation proposed.

QUESTIONS concerning this application should be directed to the project manager, Steve Andrews Jr., in writing at the Pensacola Permits Section, 41 North Jefferson Street, Suite 301, Pensacola, Florida 32502, by electronic mail at stephen.w.andrews@usace.army.mil, by fax at (850) 433-8160, or by telephone at (850) 439-0707.

IMPACT ON NATURAL RESOURCES: Coordination with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the National Marine Fisheries Services, and other Federal, State, and local agencies, environmental groups, and concerned citizens generally yields pertinent environmental information that is instrumental in determining the impact the proposed action will have on the natural resources of the area.

EVALUATION: The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impact including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity on the public interest. That decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefits, which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal, must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal will be considered including cumulative impacts thereof; among these are conservation, economics, esthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, historical properties, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, floodplain values, land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food, and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and in general, the needs and welfare of the people. Evaluation of the impact of the activity on the public interest will also include application of the guidelines promulgated by the Administrator, EPA, under authority of Section 404(b) of the Clean Water Act or the criteria established under authority of Section 102(a) of the Marine Protection Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972. A permit will be granted unless its issuance is found to be contrary to the public interest.

The US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State, and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes; and other Interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps to determine whether to issue, modify, condition, or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this determination, comments are used to assess impacts to endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects, and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity.

COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT CONSISTENCY: In Florida, the State approval constitutes compliance with the approved Coastal Zone Management Plan. In Puerto Rico, a Coastal Zone Management Consistency Concurrence is required from the Puerto Rico Planning Board. In the Virgin Islands, the Department of Planning and Natural Resources permit constitutes compliance with the Coastal Zone Management Plan.

REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING: Any person may request a public hearing. The request must be submitted in writing to the District Engineer within the designated comment period of the notice and must state the specific reasons for requesting the public hearing.

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS P ENSACOLA REGULATORY OFFICE 41 NORTH JEFFERSON STREET, SUITE 301 PENSACOLA, FLORIDA 32502 RIPLY TO ATTENTION OF

February 8, 2018

Regulatory Division North Branch Pensacola Permits Section

PUBLIC NOTICE Permit Appl ication No. SAJ-2017-02357 (SP-SWA) TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: The Jacksonville District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) has received an application for a Department of the Army permit pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. §1344) and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. §403)as described below: APPLICANT:

Escambia County Board of County Commissioners Marine Resources Division 3360 West Park Place Pensacola, Florida 32502

WATERWAY AND LOCATION: The proposed deployment site is located in the Gulf of Mexico adjacent to the Pensacola Beach Fishing Pier, approximately 540 feet south of the existing Casino Beach public access, within Escambia County, Florida. APPROXIMATE COORDINATES: Corner

Latitude

Longitude

Northwest

30.32860°

-87. 14271 °

Northeast

30.32890°

-87. 14084°

Southeast

30.32647°

-87. 14031°

Southwest

30.32617°

-87.14220°

PROJECT PURPOSE: Basic: Artificial Reef. Overall: Establish a network of artificial reefs off of Casino Beach in the Gulf of Mexico to provide reef habitat and recreational fishing opportunities. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The proposed artificial reef site would be located in the Gulf of Mexico, approximately 540 feet south of the existing Casino Beach public access in

Escambia County. The habitat within the proposed artificial reef site contains medium to coarse grained sands, predominately unvegetated with a surficial layer of microalgae/cyanobacteria. There is no submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV's) located within the reef deployment site. Additionally, there are no natural rock outcrops or hard bottom formations within the deployment site. The water depth within the proposed project area ranges from approximately 10 feet to 25 feet NAVD 1988. PROPOSED WORK: The applicant seeks to establish a 600-foot by 900-foot artificial reef deployment area, which would be referred to as the Pensacola Beach Fishing Pier Habitat Enhancement Artificial Reef Site. Specifically, the applicant proposes to create six (6) 20 feet by 20 feet patch reefs, approximately 23 feet east and west of the existing pier. Each patch reef would be comprised of Class II size stone or equivalent. The proposed vertical relief for each patch reef would be approximately 4 feet. above the Gulf bottom. Additionally, four (4) pile supported multi-media reef modules (i.e. Walter Eco-Systems Reef Modules or similar pre-fabricated units) are proposed to be installed, beginning approximately 340 feet southeast of the southeast corner of the terminal platform of the Pensacola Beach Fishing Pier. The pre-fabricated reef modules consists of a stack of concrete disks embedded with limestone rock, approximately 5 feet in diameter, with a center support pile that extends into the Gulf bottom to ensure modules remain firmly in place and do not subside. The four reef modules would be oriented in a southeasterly direction and spaced approximately 50 feet on center. Both the patch reefs and reef modules would be deployed a minimum of 50 feet inside the proposed reef deployment boundary. The proposed reefs would be placed so that the top of each reef does not exceed 1/2 distance from the bottom of the surface of the water at mean low tide. AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION INFORMATION: The applicant has provided the following information in support of efforts to avoid and/or minimize impacts to the aquatic environment: The applicant selected a site that is devoid of submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV's) and where there are no natural rock outcrops or hard bottom formations. COMPENSATORY MITIGATION: The applicant has offered the following compensatory mitigation plan to offset unavoidable functional loss to the aquatic environment: No compensatory mitigation is proposed. CULTURAL RESOURCES: The Corps is not aware of any known historic properties within the permit area. By copy of this public notice, the Corps is providing information for review. Our final determination relative to historic resource impacts is subject to review by and coordination with the State Historic Preservation Officer and those federally recognized tribes with concerns in Florida and the Permit Area.

2

ENDANGERED SPECIES: The Corps has determined the proposed project may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect, Gulf Sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus desotoi) and its designated critical habitat (Unit 11), smalltooth sawfish (Pristis pectinata) and the following species of swimming sea turtles: green turtle (Chelonia mydas), hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricate), Kemp's ridley turtle (Lepidochelys kempii), leatherback turtle (Dermochelys coriacea), loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta). The Corps will request National Marine Fisheries Service concurrence with this determination pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act. ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT (EFH): This notice initiates consultation with the National Marine Fisheries Service on EFH as required by the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 1996. The proposal would impact unvegetated bottom in the nearshore waters of the Gulf of Mexico and may be utilized by various life stages of species within the following Fisheries Managements Plans (Shrimp, Reef Fish, Stone Crab and Coastal Migratory Pelagics). Our initial determination is that the proposed action would not have a substantial adverse impact on EFH or Federally managed fisheries in the Gulf of Mexico. Our final determination relative to project impacts and the need for mitigation measures is subject to review by and coordination with the National Marine Fisheries Service. NOTE: This public notice is being issued based on information furnished by the applicant. This information has not been verified or evaluated to ensure compliance with laws and regulation governing the regulatory program. The jurisdictional line has not been verified by Corps personnel. AUTHORIZATION FROM OTHER AGENCIES: Water Quality Certification may be required from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and/or one of the state Water Management Districts. COMMENTS regarding the potential authorization of the work proposed should be submitted in writing to the attention of the District Engineer through the Pensacola Permits Section, 41 North Jefferson Street, Suite 301, Pensacola, Florida 32502, within 30 days from the date of this notice. The decision whether to issue or deny this permit application will be based on the information received from this public notice and the evaluation of the probable impact to the associated wetlands. This is based on an analysis of the applicant's avoidance and minimization efforts for the project, as well as the compensatory mitigation proposed. QUESTIONS concerning this application should be directed to the project manager, Steve Andrews Jr., in writing at the Pensacola Permits Section, 41 North Jefferson Street, Suite 301, Pensacola, Florida 32502, by electronic mail at stephen.w.andrews@usace.army.mil, by fax at (850) 433-8160, or by telephone at (850) 439-0707.

3

IMPACT ON NATURAL RESOURCES: Coordination with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the National Marine Fisheries Services, and other Federal, State, and local agencies, environmental groups, and concerned citizens generally yields pertinent environmental information that is instrumental in determining the impact the proposed action will have on the natural resources of the area. EVALUATION: The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impact including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity on the public interest. That decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefits, which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal, must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal will be considered including cumulative impacts thereof; among these are conservation, economics, esthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, historical properties, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, floodplain values, land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food, and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and in general, the needs and welfare of the people. Evaluation of the impact of the activity on the public interest will also include application of the guidelines promulgated by the Administrator, EPA, under authority of Section 404(b) of the Clean Water Act or the criteria established under authority of Section 102(a) of the Marine Protection Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972. A permit will be granted unless its issuance is found to be contrary to the public interest. The US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State, and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes; and other Interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps to determine whether to issue, modify, condition, or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this determination, comments are used to assess impacts to endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects, and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity. COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT CONSISTENCY: In Florida, the State approval constitutes compliance with the approved Coastal Zone Management Plan. In Puerto Rico, a Coastal Zone Management Consistency Concurrence is required from the Puerto Rico Planning Board. In the Virgin Islands, the Department of Planning and Natural Resources permit constitutes compliance with the Coastal Zone Management Plan. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING: Any person may request a public hearing. The request must be submitted in writing to the District Engineer within the designated comment period of the notice and must state the specific reasons for requesting the public hearing. 4

c

-

Old Navy C.

°"'s --- ----- -

---- ---------

--- ----

rJ1JI'$ ,,318

(i.S8

PROJECT LOCATION

fa

NOTE: FOR PERMITTlNG PURPOSES ONLY. NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION.

WET~ND f

s tt:_;.JI.11~ li'-lf c

--- -

INCORPORA T

s

n--11

ED

IRONM~ TAL CONSULTANTS

N

PROJ:.CT N :.: PNS Pl:.R H- IT-T :.NH SIT:. LOC-TION

:.M:.NT

3308 GUL ::.ACH HIGHWAY PROJ:.CT NO.: 2007- 103 P::.NSACOLA, ,1DA 32507 T::.L: 850.453.4700 DR': KDJ D-T:.: 7/31/2017 K::.ITH@W::.TLANDSCl::.NC::.S.COM - S-H-:.:.-T:_1_0___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _____,

1------------------1

41

& 1 36-S)

:.NJ\

D:.P D::P :.NT """'\

CO- T

::.S R-119

CO- T

D:.P ::.NT

CO- T

:.S R- 121

:.S R- 120

'\

-·-·-7 ·-

.- ·- ·- ·- , -

D::.P

1986 CCCL LIN::.

The material shall be placed so that the tcp of the reef does not exceed 1/2 the distance from tbe botll>m to the surfi.re of the waler nnless a greater distmcecftom the swface is roquired for saf· mvig1tion At m time sbaU the distance between the IQP of the reefand the surlilce of the water be Jess than 6 ~ Contm:tor shall verify depths prior to deploymmt to

Pensacol'a Beach -ishing Pier No- : - r permi -ing purposes only. No- released - r cons-rue-ion.

Habi·c ::.nhancerneno- h Ree·

,-- ~--~~;)

Reef Boundary Deployment Coordinates

NW Corner NE Corner SE Comer SW Corner

Northing Easting I 134818.2684 492835.91 43 I J354 LOAl 48 492932. 6753 I 135555. I465 4920%.9637 I 134%3.0001 491950.2027

No- : CoordinaZone, Uni

Lat 30°19.71559' Ju· I9.7J31!1 ' 30°19 58828' 30° 19.57006

I

Long

1

-087°08.56293'

I

-us1·u8.4SU77'

-087°08.41935' -087°08.53 15 1'

repor d in S-alane, -lorida Norh La-/ Long repor- d in Degrees Minu-

900.0

I: I

I

·

·

.

t

· ·

Deploymen -rea

v 9 o o· x 600· I I

roposed -

1r (4) llered Ree-

I II

r -----,

I

IL ___ _JI

-r·-i ial Reeploymenindory 600' x 900'

I

·

Proposed Pi r Hab"-a ::.nhoncemen- o- h Ree-

I '--------------l --1-- - 600.0 - - · 1

·

roposed TI red Reedules

Gulfof¥taico

N

WET~ND

s1~~ I r~) l'-1 rr~ip1 S N C 0

R P 0

R A T E D

IRONM~

$

PROJ:.CT N :.: Pensacola Pier Habi·a· ,ee·

T-L CONSULT-NI

:.ACH HIGHWAY P::.NSACOLA, , 1DA 32507 T::.L: 850.453.4700 K::.ITH@W::.TLANDSCl::.NC::.S.COM

Ian View

PROJ:.CT NO.:

DR': KDJ SH::.:.T: 2 o-

2007-1 03

0-T:.: 04/03/17

SC

1"=

... .. .. ... . ....... . . . . . . . . . . .

No- ; - r permi -ing purposes only. No- released - r cons·ruc· ion.

.. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

-:i

....... .. .. . .. .. ....- . . . . ..-

Tbemalerial shall b,; placed so that the l"P ofthe reef does not exceed 112 the distance lrmn the bollOm to the surface ofthe a ~~mm the surface is req.m.d for safe navigation Afno limo shall the dirtance belw- thetopof thenef'alld ibe sud'ac· of the -..10r be less dwi 6 feet ~tor shall verify depdis prior to d

_.,.unless

Reef Boundary De ployme nt Coordinates

NW Corner NE Corner SE Comer SW Comer

Northing 1134818.2684 1135410.41 48 1135555.1465 J 134963.CXXJJ

Easting 492835.9143 492932.6753 492046.%37 491950.2027

Lon2 -087°08.56293' -087°08.45077' -087°08.41935' -08 7°08.53 1. 5 1'

I.at

30" 19.71559' 30°19.73381 ' 30°19.58828' 30° 19.57006'

'

600.0 :

.......... .

Habi· o

e

::.nhoncemen-

J

·

I

-

I

120.0

- ...1

I

I 1

II

.

-

Bt n

t p)

:

_

-

!I

·

I

-

__/-

I

Pile

I I 1111 · I

- ·1

~o.o3--· I -

a·hRee- ~ To-ol) 1

· "' · · 1111

l

I

I

I

...······

' I · · 1111

. .

lI

~

··

''

· · · ·'

.....

I

l

I

..... ...

e e

1111 I

I ·· ·

-20

I

· :·

·

IL._ ___..Jl

I

I

-r·-;

ial Reeindary 600'

ploymen-

x 900'

l

I I

I l

0-50.0

·

lndivldvol Tiered Ree

'Il

"-j 107,0

1=.

- m 4-To-ol

···· · ······· · ············ ~ ······ · ········ · ····· .

II I I-

· ·

Proposed Pi r Hab"-a :.nhancemen- a- h Ree· roposed dules

n

red Ree-

l

61.4

I L~---------~---~---------- ~ ---

"

r-----.,

I

302

I I I

1151>-·34-2603

... ·..............·.............. , , , , , , , , , , , ,

II

I I l

- - X ir.»-·14-2650

e · ·

I I I

I I I

r - . i· .-s11.

·

l

I

a -, a,ll A32505

900.0

I

I

;···~·····

.·············· ·· ·····························

1

I

Pensacola dieoch - ishin~ Pier

-

- 15

I

···········r····· l

-

Con- 1rs re- re need

I

370.0

····· ······ ···· · I

oNSA

.. ... ..... ...... .. .

~

--~f:~~0--~~..'.~----------, - ...4:~.·..?. ~:;: -····· I I

HEt

. .. .... .

~

·1

I

~

HAM D I ::.N I o~RT I a , 11A (tl.JTHD,I - TI a - LABAHA AUTHD~,I -TI a 3lllse a , TH ·s· ST.R::.:.T

. .. . . . . . . ..

- 10

I

--~

._____. ....

...... ·· · ····· -25-···········r························

N

WET~ND

s '(__; ir IF')1'...1 tt_; 1~) s I

N

c

0

R

p

0

R

A T

E

D

~

I RONM~

PROJ:.CT N

T-L CONSULT-NI

P::.NSACOLA,

-

:.ACH HIGHWAY , 1DA 32507

T::.L: 850.453.4700 K :.ITH@W:.TLANDSCl:.NC:.S.COM

$

:.: Pensacola Pier Ho bi -a - ,ee-

Ian View PROJ:.CT NO.: DR-

': KDJ

SH:.:.T: 3 o-

2007- 103

?

I

D-T:.:

I

I

04/03/17

SC

- ' 1"= ....

-

.... .

fljo- : - r perm1-ing purposes only, No- released - r cons-rue-ion.

1---~-------- 1-

··········j········"·······.····.=··;;.'1 ... '

............. :oo____

_

1

·I

~-

I

"---"'/

Pile

~np) /

I I I II

j-ishing

I_

·

·

I

I

I

'

I

I

I

I

I ti

·r e_..,.

--~~~~~~~-!

'. ·' _

·

···

, , ., ··' ' ·· ' ····

........

I..

·

·

·

·· ·

· ·

..

· · ····

. I

I

··············· ~ ···· ~········~

15

t: I

The material shall so that die top df lhe reef does not - a 112 tbe distance from Che bcJttom to ,sudace.Qf the.water \IDless a greater distm.c:e fmiD die .sm:face is -teqaiRd fi>r SIJI. . . Al no lime shall the disl3Dce ~em lhe lop orlbeeet" md the SlllD

·

1

·· , · · ' '

r

I

. ~ ....

·········· -20 ... I

·

························· 411

"

411

..........

I. I I. I

111

·· ,········

·· I

·

·

·

·

WET~ND

S t :__:; ir rr-1 l'-1 re__:, t~1 S 1

INCORPORATED

:..N

1

I

T-L CONSULT-NI

~oRT

T

a, TH ·s· STR:.:.T D'11A 32'505 950-c34-~ --x 850-43,...2'54 1~o.ndd!!sl I · l'I -

I

I IRONM~

T

380e

:.NSA D

'1

··

·

HEt

. l:Ji\11 a

....... AL~I~:.: :Ji~8~f :if g - · ·····e:

· · · · · .. ·

I

·

TO MLLW \

~

II I

II

CONTOURS

Pier~

1

I

R~-

.......... ~......

1ndcry

oeploymen-

I

__

······~~L~·::·· II I

!IV 370

~

II

I

1

,l20

-

J

I

I,~~~~~~

· · · . ,_. · ·

-

Proposed Pi r Hab'·a :.nhancemen- o- h Ree-

· r°du~::d Ti" red Ree-

I

-

II

I

f

~{£2·

I II

e

I

1Z120

1

-r·-i ial Reeploymen· mdory 600' x 900'

I ·

I

=

/

I

IL_ ___ _ JI

=T

lr--99.7 ----j

I

... . . . ...:.\e>-'!. - -------

I ,----,

N

$

PROJ:.CT N :.: Pensacola Pier Habi·a- ,eeIan View Po- h Ree-

1------------------1

:.ACH HIGHWAY P:.NSACOLA, , !DA 32507 PROJ:.CT NO.: - 1o3 T:.L: 850.453.4700 DR' : KDJ D-T:.: 04/03/17 K:. ITH@W:.TL.ANDSCI:.NC :.S.COM 1-s'"'"H,.... :. _..T , _,.....:-4,....._o_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.;.,,_....;___ _-I

~

I

SC

.

-- · 1"=

I

I

-

..

No- : - r perm1 -,ng purposes only. No- releosed - r cons-ruc·-ion.

..

TOURS_/

.,

\?o

R::.- TO "4LLW

''

''

' ....

''

''

' ....,, '

Tiered Ree-

''

.. . ... .... .... ..

' ',

- "(4)

''

''

'

ploymen-

' ' ' '..,

50.0

'

''

... .... .... ..

''

''

'''

'

''

·---t

50.0

''

.. .

... .... .

... ....

HEI

HAMDl::.lfl=RT OJI A IWTHC ·I -Tl

a a

T

A L - llllTHC\ I -TI 3802 a, TH "$' ST!!=T

a -.

a , 11 A 32~05

' "',,,

/ ·

'·,,',,/'"' ' ' ..

.... .... ....

r-----.,

IL ____ .JI

·

' ',

' ....

' ',

',

' ,,

',

· ''

...

8511-434-260~

-- x

To-01~0

' ' ·,

.. .

,.JISA

·1

dules

85Q-Q4- 2650

Proposed Pi r Hob'-o :.nhoncemen· o- h Reereposed dules

n

red Ree-

' ' ' ...," Tbe malerial shall be placed so lhlt lbe top oflbe reef does not ac:eed 1121be clUtmice liom the bottom "' Ille smface ciflbe-unlm · peab!r dislmc.. liom the surface.is requDM fnr afe "-vigatioa Al DO lime shalJ lbe disllnce lJetw'""8 lbe lop of lbe reef md Ille sud'lce of lbe water be lea tbm 6 re..t C

... ·-

r...1..1a- 1."

-r'-i iol Reeploymen· 1ndory 600' x 900'

foe111U1et!iis.....;i;,;_ismd

~

WET~ND

S '(_:; ir

r~1 1'.Jf «"_:, 1~1

s

INCORPORATED

1RONM~ T-L CONSULT-NI :.ACH HIGHWAY P=.NSACOLA, , IDA 32507 T=.L: 850.453.4700 K:.ITH@W:.TLANDSCl:.NC:.S.COM

PROJ:.CT N

~

:.: Pensacola Pier Habi-a- ,ee-

Ian View 0 - hore Deploymen-

1-------------------l 1 PROJ:.CT NO.:

ORSH:.:.T:

': KDJ

s

o-

- 03

~

I

I

I

0-T:.: 04/03/17

SC

1"=

-

No- : - r permi -in g purposes only. No- released - r cons-rue-ion.

The material shall be placed so that the top of 1he reef does not ex~ Jn the distance from the bottom to the swface of the water unless a ueater distance from the swface is required for safe navigation At no time shall the distance between the top of the reef and 1he swface of the water be Jess than 6 feet Contractor shall \'erify depths prior to deployment to ensure this condition is met

Pile Ben- Typical

r

::.~RT a , 11 (le AUTHD , I -TI

HAM D I ::.N

a

ALABAMA AtlTHO, J - Tl D 3802 a, TH "S" S TR ~T ~NSA

r

-

a - - a,11 A 32505 850- ·3·- 2603

- - X 850- · 3· -2G50 Tor11!selo.nddts1 1 · n

___ ____ - .....,

MU.W

~-

Proposed Po- h Reeloss II Size s- ne or ::.quivolen-

10.0 4.0

Gui

WET~ND

S rr. ir

.

_ _/ -

I

N

c

0

rrl l'--1 tt"~-,µ S

_!___) -

R

p

_:_!__) -

0

R

A

T

E

D

~

IRONM~

T-L CONSULT-NI

:.ACH HIGHWAY , 10A 32507 P=.NSACOLA, T::.L: 850.453.4700 K::.ITH@W::.TLANDSCl::.NC::.S.COM

- m

PROJ:.CT N :.: Pensacola Pier Hobi-o - 'eeIon View 0 - hore Deploymen-

PROJ:.CT NO.:

,_

' : KDJ

SH:.:.T: 6 o-

-1 03 D-T::.:

04/03/17 SC

1"=

No- : ~ r perm1 -ing purposes only. No- released - r cons-rue -ion.

WALTER ECO-SYSTEM REEF PROFILE 10" P::.ARSON PILING

WALTER ECO- SYS TEM REEF TOP VIEW

COMP OSI T::. PILING STOP BOLT::.D TO PILI NG USING SS BOLTS

5' WID::. CONCR:. T::. DISK WITH LIM:.STON::. BOULD::.RS ::.MB::.DD:.D APPROX 4"

LIM::.STON::. ROCKS

COMPOSI T::. PILI NG STOP SOLT::.D TO PILING USING SS BOLTS

~I ~ ir 1~1 ~~Jr~ "·~ ~ ~· t(_ __, ~ ._..J '.· J _ J _!_._J _ _.) I N C 0

R P 0

R A T E D

10" P:.ARSON PILING

PR:.- CAST CONCR:. T::. DISK TIOM

PILING :.MB:.DO::.D APPROXIM AT:.LY 30' B:.LOW GRAD:.

WETI!'tND f

LIM::.STON::. ROCKS

l'be material shall be placed so thit the top oftbe reef dresnor exceed 1/2 the dislallce from the bottom to the rurface ofthe water unless a greater distance from ibe surface is required for safe na\'igation At no time sball the distance between the lop of the reef and the

PROJ:.CT N :.: PNS Pier Hobi-a - hore Tier Module De-a·il

HEI

HAMMOND ENGINEERING, IN C. ~nhancemen

F'L.ORIOA AUTHORIZATION ND. 91 30 AL.ASAMA AtJTt-tORI ZATION NO. 3277

3802 NDR.T-

1

PE.NSAO-OLA, FLORIOA 32SOS

850· 434· 2603 F'AX 850· 434-2650 ToM @!IELANOOE:SIGN.COM

Rough impact

We use the fields in this section to decide whether to conduct an in-depth review.

Permit Manager

Dates

Identity numbers

Permits, certifications, and locations related to this particular notice

History of edits

Data are available as CSV download in the following schemas