You can copy from here when filling out the rest of the page.
Interested parties are hereby notified that a Department of the Army permit application has been
Interested parties are hereby notified that a Department of the Army permit application has been received for work in waters of the United States as described below and shown on the enclosed project drawings.
Comments on the described work, with the reference number, should reach this office no later than the expiration date of this Public Notice to become part of the record and be considered in the decision. Please contact Randal Vigil at (907) 790-4491 or by email at Randal.P.Vigil@usace.army.mil if further information is desired concerning this notice.
APPLICANT: City and Borough of Juneau, Docks and Harbors Department, 155 South Seward Street, Juneau, Alaska 99801.
City and Borough of Juneau, Docks and Harbors Department, 155 South Seward Street, Juneau, Alaska 99801.
AGENT: PND Engineers, Inc., 9360 Glacier Highway, Suite 100, Juneau, Alaska 99801. PND Engineers, Inc., 9360 Glacier Highway, Suite 100, Juneau, Alaska 99801.
LOCATION: The project site is located within Section 23, T. 41 S., R. 67 E., Copper Meridian; USGS Quad Map Juneau B-2; Latitude 58.296º N., Longitude 134.402º W.; Alaska Tidelands Survey 3; at the Smokeries dock, the Alaska Steamship Wharf and the Cruise Ship Terminal, in Juneau, Alaska.
The project site is located within Section 23, T. 41 S., R. 67 E., Copper Meridian; USGS Quad Map Juneau B-2; Latitude 58.296º N., Longitude 134.402º W.; Alaska Tidelands Survey 3; at the Smokeries dock, the Alaska Steamship Wharf and the Cruise Ship Terminal, in Juneau, Alaska.
PURPOSE: The applicant’s stated purpose is to expand the “Smokeries dock, and improve access, security, berthing capacity, and safety at the City and Borough of Juneau’s Downtown Cruise Ship Docks.”
The applicant’s stated purpose is to expand the “Smokeries dock, and improve access, security, berthing capacity, and safety at the City and Borough of Juneau’s Downtown Cruise Ship Docks.”
PROPOSED WORK: The applicant requests authorization for the following work in waters and navigable waters of the United States: 1. Discharge approximately 200cubic yards of fill material into approximately 0.049 acres below the high tide line (approximate elevation +20.8 feet above the 0.0 foot contour) to construction a retaining wall. 2. Construct below the Mean High Water mark (approximate elevation +15.4 feet above the 0.0 foot contour) (MHW) two offshore cruise ship
The applicant requests authorization for the following work in waters and navigable waters of the United States: 1. Discharge approximately 200cubic yards of fill material into approximately 0.049 acres below the high tide line (approximate elevation +20.8 feet above the 0.0 foot contour) to construction a retaining wall. 2. Construct below the Mean High Water mark (approximate elevation +15.4 feet above the 0.0 foot contour) (MHW) two offshore cruise ship berths. Refer to the below impact tables for details, including the removal of the existing South Ferry Dock, transfer bridge, and associated dolphins and catwalks. All work would be performed in accordance with the enclosed plan (sheets 1-14), dated August 2011.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The proposed project design is a combination of fixed and floating docks, both of which require steel piles to support or anchor these structures. The floating docks would be manufactured offsite, towed to the site and field installed. The overall in-water work would be significantly shortened by this process. The primary type of pile that would be used at the site would be hollow steel pipe piles. The means of installation would vary with specific locations and would include rock anchors, pin piles, or rock sockets as necessary. The piles would be driven to bedrock or as deep into existing soils as necessary to resist the design loads. Rock anchor and pin pile installation would be similar in that a smaller diameter hole would be drilled into the bedrock underneath the pile, and an anchor rod or small diameter pin pile would be grouted into the hole. Then the annulus between the pile and the anchor rod or pin pile would be also grouted to transfer load between the pile and the anchor rod or pin pile. A rock socket consists of a hole drilled into bedrock. The structural pile would then be driven into the hole to provide a stable base and provide a higher level of uplift and lateral resistance. The means with which piles would be installed would need to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. The applicant supports the use of vibratory pile driving equipment as the primary installation method for the project, impact hammers would only be allowed for piles that encounter soils too dense to penetrate with the vibratory equipment, however, bedrock conditions are anticipated.
The proposed project design is a combination of fixed and floating docks, both of which require steel piles to support or anchor these structures. The floating docks would be manufactured offsite, towed to the site and field installed. The overall in-water work would be significantly shortened by this process. The primary type of pile that would be used at the site would be hollow steel pipe piles. The means of installation would vary with specific locations and would include rock anchors, pin piles, or rock sockets as necessary. The piles would be driven to bedrock or as deep into existing soils as necessary to resist the design loads. Rock anchor and pin pile installation would be similar in that a smaller diameter hole would be drilled into the bedrock underneath the pile, and an anchor rod or small diameter pin pile would be grouted into the hole. Then the annulus between the pile and the anchor rod or pin pile would be also grouted to transfer load between the pile and the anchor rod or pin pile. A rock socket consists of a hole drilled into bedrock. The structural pile would then be driven into the hole to provide a stable base and provide a higher level of uplift and lateral resistance. The means with which piles would be installed would need to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. The applicant supports the use of vibratory pile driving equipment as the primary installation method for the project, impact hammers would only be allowed for piles that encounter soils too dense to penetrate with the vibratory equipment, however, bedrock conditions are anticipated.
APPLICANT PROPOSED MITIGATION: The applicant has made the following statements concerning mitigation measures to avoid, minimize, and compensate for impacts to waters of the United States from activities involving discharges of dredged or fill material.
The applicant has made the following statements concerning mitigation measures to avoid, minimize, and compensate for impacts to waters of the United States from activities involving discharges of dredged or fill material.
a. Avoidance: “This project utilizes pile supported and floating structures to the maximum extent possible. One small concrete retaining wall is required along the upper elevation of an existing slope to replace two existing dilapidated timber walls. Inherently, impacts to the waters of the U.S. will occur by placing fill for the retaining wall. The project includes removing two existing timber retaining walls and replacing them with a concrete retaining wall.”
“This project utilizes pile supported and floating structures to the maximum extent possible. One small concrete retaining wall is required along the upper elevation of an existing slope to replace two existing dilapidated timber walls. Inherently, impacts to the waters of the U.S. will occur by placing fill for the retaining wall. The project includes removing two existing timber retaining walls and replacing them with a concrete retaining wall.”
b. Minimization: “The design has been optimized to minimize any impacts beyond what is required to construct the retaining wall associated with the CBJ Downtown Cruise Ship Docks project. While the existing fill slope at the site varies from approximately 1:4 to 1:9 (H:V), the project design incorporates the use of a concrete retaining wall with a rip rap slope at the base of the wall designed at 1.5:1 to minimize fill quantities as much as practicable while still meeting the intended purpose and need.”
“The design has been optimized to minimize any impacts beyond what is required to construct the retaining wall associated with the CBJ Downtown Cruise Ship Docks project. While the existing fill slope at the site varies from approximately 1:4 to 1:9 (H:V), the project design incorporates the use of a concrete retaining wall with a rip rap slope at the base of the wall designed at 1.5:1 to minimize fill quantities as much as practicable while still meeting the intended purpose and need.”
c. Compensatory Mitigation: “Placement of fill and impacts to waters of the U.S. are minor, approximately 0.049 acres below the HTL. The purpose of the fill is to prevent erosion and provide slope stability, no additional mitigation measures are being proposed.”
“Placement of fill and impacts to waters of the U.S. are minor, approximately 0.049 acres below the HTL. The purpose of the fill is to prevent erosion and provide slope stability, no additional mitigation measures are being proposed.”
WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION: A permit for the described work will not be issued until a certification or waiver of certification, as required under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (Public Law 95-217), has been received from the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation.
A permit for the described work will not be issued until a certification or waiver of certification, as required under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (Public Law 95-217), has been received from the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation.
CULTURAL RESOURCES: The latest published version of the Alaska Heritage Resources Survey (AHRS) has been consulted for the presence or absence of historic properties, including those listed in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. There is an unevaluated property in the vicinity of the worksite. It has been designated JUN-314. There are also registered or eligible properties in the vicinity of the worksite. They have been designated JUN-00376, JUN-00118, JUN-00374, JUN-00212, and JUN-00373. Because these properties have been determined to be outside of the project area, we have determined that there would be no effect to historic properties. Consultation of the AHRS constitutes the extent of cultural resource investigations by the District Commander at this time. This application is being coordinated with SHPO. Any comments SHPO may have concerning presently unknown archeological or historic data that may be lost or destroyed by work under the requested permit will be considered in our final assessment of the described work.
The latest published version of the Alaska Heritage Resources Survey (AHRS) has been consulted for the presence or absence of historic properties, including those listed in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. There is an unevaluated property in the vicinity of the worksite. It has been designated . There are also registered or eligible properties in the vicinity of the worksite. They have been designated Because these properties have been determined to be outside of the project area, we have determined that there would be no effect to historic properties. Consultation of the AHRS constitutes the extent of cultural resource investigations by the District Commander at this time. This application is being coordinated with SHPO. Any comments SHPO may have concerning presently unknown archeological or historic data that may be lost or destroyed by work under the requested permit will be considered in our final assessment of the described work.
ENDANGERED SPECIES: The project area is within the known or historic range of the Humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) and Steller sea lion (Eumetopias jubatus). Preliminarily, we have determined the described activity would have no effect on any listed or proposed threatened or endangered species, and would have no effect on any designated or proposed critical habitat, under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (87 Stat. 844). This application is being coordinated with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). Any comments they may have concerning endangered or threatened wildlife or plants or their critical habitat will be considered in our final assessment of the described work.
The project area is within the known or historic range of the Humpback whale (and Steller sea lion.) Preliminarily, we have determined the described activity would have no effect on any listed or proposed threatened or endangered species, and would have no effect on any designated or proposed critical habitat, under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (87 Stat. 844). This application is being coordinated with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). Any comments they may have concerning endangered or threatened wildlife or plants or their critical habitat will be considered in our final assessment of the described work.
ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT: The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, as amended by the Sustainable Fisheries Act of 1996, requires all Federal agencies to consult with the NMFS on all actions, or proposed actions, permitted, funded, or undertaken by the agency, that may adversely affect Essential Fish Habitat (EFH).
The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, as amended by the Sustainable Fisheries Act of 1996, requires all Federal agencies to consult with the NMFS on all actions, or proposed actions, permitted, funded, or undertaken by the agency, that may adversely affect Essential Fish Habitat (EFH).
The project area is within the known range of the Chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), chum (Oncorhynchus keta), Coho (Oncorhynchus kisutch), pink (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha), and sockeye (Oncorhynchus nerka) salmon, and the following species of groundfish: Arrowtooth flounder (Atheresthes stomias), flathead sole (Hippoglossoides elassodon), rex sole (Glyptocephalus zachirus), rock sole (Lepidopsetta polyxystra and L. bilineata), Dover sole (Microstomus pacificus), dusky rockfish (Sebastes ciliates), Pacific cod (Gadus macrocephalus), Pacific ocean perch (Sebastes alutus), shortraker rockfish (Sebastes borealis), rougheye rockfish (Sebastes aleutianus), sablefish (Anoplopoma fimbria), skates (Raja binoculata and R. rhina), walleye Pollock (Theragra chalcogramma), yelloweye rockfish (Sebastes ruberrimus), and sculpins (Cottidae spp.).
Preliminarily, we have determined the described activity may adversely affect EFH in the project area for the following species: Chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), chum (Oncorhynchus keta), Coho (Oncorhynchus kisutch), pink (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha), and sockeye (Oncorhynchus nerka) salmon. The proposed project location is nearshore shallow water habitat primarily for adult and juvenile salmon migration, as these waters provide refuge from predators and opportunity to rest. The proposed project would extend a portion of the shoreline into deeper water and involve pile driving, which may increase salmon mortality, particularly juveniles, through predation. This Public Notice initiates EFH consultation with the NMFS. Any comments or recommendations they may have concerning EFH will be considered in our final assessment of the described work.
TRIBAL CONSULTATION: The Alaska District fully supports tribal self-governance and government-to-government relations between Federally recognized Tribes and the Federal government. Tribes with protected rights or resources that could be significantly affected by a proposed Federal action (e.g., a permit decision) have the right to consult with the Alaska District on a government-to-government basis. Views of each Tribe regarding protected rights and resources will be accorded due consideration in this process. This Public Notice serves as notification to the Tribes within the area potentially affected by the proposed work and invites their participation in the Federal decision-making process regarding the protected Tribal right or resource. Consultation may be initiated by the affected Tribe upon written request to the District Commander during the public comment period.
The Alaska District fully supports tribal self-governance and government-to-government relations between Federally recognized Tribes and the Federal government. Tribes with protected rights or resources that could be significantly affected by a proposed Federal action (e.g., a permit decision) have the right to consult with the Alaska District on a government-to-government basis. Views of each Tribe regarding protected rights and resources will be accorded due consideration in this process. This Public Notice serves as notification to the Tribes within the area potentially affected by the proposed work and invites their participation in the Federal decision-making process regarding the protected Tribal right or resource. Consultation may be initiated by the affected Tribe upon written request to the District Commander during the public comment period.
PUBLIC HEARING: Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in this notice, that a public hearing be held to consider this application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with particularity, reasons for holding a public hearing.
Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in this notice, that a public hearing be held to consider this application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with particularity, reasons for holding a public hearing.
EVALUATION: The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts, including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity andits intended use on the public interest. Evaluation of the probable impacts, which the proposed activity may have on the public interest, requires a careful weighing of all the factors that become relevant in each particular case. The benefits, which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal, must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. The outcome of the general balancing process would determine whether to authorize a proposal, and if so, the conditions under which it will be allowed to occur. The decision should reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. All factors, which may be relevant to the proposal, must be considered including the cumulative effects thereof. Among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, floodplain values, land use, navigation, shore erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving 404 discharges, a permit will be denied if the discharge that would be authorized by such permit would not comply with the Environmental Protection Agency's 404(b)(l) guidelines. Subject to the preceding sentence and any other applicable guidelines or criteria (see Sections 320.2 and 320.3), a permit will be granted unless the District Commander determines that it would be contrary to the public interest.
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts, including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity andits intended use on the public interest. Evaluation of the probable impacts, which the proposed activity may have on the public interest, requires a careful weighing of all the factors that become relevant in each particular case. The benefits, which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal, must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. The outcome of the general balancing process would determine whether to authorize a proposal, and if so, the conditions under which it will be allowed to occur. The decision should reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. All factors, which may be relevant to the proposal, must be considered including the cumulative effects thereof. Among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, floodplain values, land use, navigation, shore erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving 404 discharges, a permit will be denied if the discharge that would be authorized by such permit would not comply with the Environmental Protection Agency's 404(b)(l) guidelines. Subject to the preceding sentence and any other applicable guidelines or criteria (see Sections 320.2 and 320.3), a permit will be granted unless the District Commander determines that it would be contrary to the public interest.
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State, and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes; and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects, and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment and/or an Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act. Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity.
AUTHORITY: This permit will be issued or denied under the following authorities:
This permit will be issued or denied under the following authorities:
(X) Perform work in or affecting navigable waters of the United States – Section 10 Rivers and Harbors Act 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403).
(X) Discharge dredged or fill material into waters of the United States – Section 404 Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). Therefore, our public interest review will consider the guidelines set forth under Section 404(b) of the Clean Water Act (40 CFR 230).
Project drawings and a Notice of Application for State Water Quality Certification are enclosed with this Public Notice.
District Commander
U.S. Army, Corps of Engineers
Enclosures
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Alaska District
Juneau Field Office
Regulatory Division (1145)
CEPOA-RD
8800 Glacier Highway, Suite 106
Juneau, Alaska 99801-8079
Public Notice
of Application
for Permit
PUBLIC NOTICE DATE:
January 3, 2012
EXPIRATION DATE:
February 1, 2012
REFERENCE NUMBER:
POA-2011-924
WATERWAY:
Gastineau Channel
Interested parties are hereby notified that a Department of the Army permit
application has been received for work in waters of the United States as described
below and shown on the enclosed project drawings.
Comments on the described work, with the reference number, should reach this office
no later than the expiration date of this Public Notice to become part of the
record and be considered in the decision. Please contact Randal Vigil at (907)
790-4491 or by email at Randal.P.Vigil@usace.army.mil if further information is
desired concerning this notice.
APPLICANT: City and Borough of Juneau, Docks and Harbors Department, 155 South
Seward Street, Juneau, Alaska 99801.
AGENT:
PND Engineers, Inc., 9360 Glacier Highway, Suite 100, Juneau, Alaska 99801.
LOCATION: The project site is located within Section 23, T. 41 S., R. 67 E.,
Copper Meridian; USGS Quad Map Juneau B-2; Latitude 58.296º N., Longitude 134.402º
W.; Alaska Tidelands Survey 3; at the Smokeries dock, the Alaska Steamship Wharf
and the Cruise Ship Terminal, in Juneau, Alaska.
PURPOSE: The applicant's stated purpose is to expand the "Smokeries dock, and
improve access, security, berthing capacity, and safety at the City and Borough of
Juneau's Downtown Cruise Ship Docks."
PROPOSED WORK: The applicant requests authorization for the following work in
waters and navigable waters of the United States: 1. Discharge approximately 200
cubic yards of fill material into approximately 0.049 acres below the high tide
line (approximate elevation +20.8 feet above the 0.0 foot contour) to construction
a retaining wall. 2. Construct below the Mean High Water mark (approximate
elevation +15.4 feet above the 0.0 foot contour) (MHW) two offshore cruise ship
berths. Refer to the below impact tables for details, including the removal of the
existing South Ferry Dock, transfer bridge, and associated dolphins and catwalks.
All work would be performed in accordance with the enclosed plan (sheets 1-14),
dated August 2011.
- 1 -
Phase 1 Retaining Wall, Moorage Float, Taku Smokeries Complete May 2013
Table 1 Demolition Plan
Structural Element
Transfer Bridge
South Ferry Dock
Dolphins and Catwalks
Size (+/- 10%)
2,600 SF
7,250 SF
6 EA, 300 LF
Number of Piles
12(Steel)
120 (Timber)
22
Pile
12" (8), 24" (4)
12"
varies
Table 2 Retaining Wall, Moorage Float and Taku Smokeries Design Elements
Structural Element
Concrete Retaining Wall
(Fill Quantities Below)
New South Ferry Dock
Replacement and Addition
Concrete Moorage Float
Gangway
Taku Smokeries Work
Deck
Addition
and
Mooring Pile
Size (+/- 10%)
75 LF x 1'-3" wide
Number of Piles
9
Pile
24"
11,000 SF
2; 34
16" ; 12.75"
16' x 250'
8' x 120'
1,000 SF
9
8
16"
16"
Number of Piles
36
8
10
27
Pile
16"
16"
48"
48"
Number of Piles
16
8
10
24
Pile
16"
16"
48"
48"
Table 3 Retaining Wall Fill Quantities
Material
Fill
Base Course
Rip Rap
Excavation
Total Area Impacted
Qty Below HTL
200 CY
20 CY
50 CY
0 CY
0.049 AC
(2,134.44 SF)
Phase 2 South Berth - Complete May 2014
Table 4 South Berth Design Elements
Structural Element
Size (+/- 10%)
Approach Dock
7,000 SF
Vehicle Transfer Bridge
140' x 24'
Bridge Support Float
25' x 30'
Bridge Landing
50' x 40'
Concrete Floating Dock
50' x 400'
Mooring and Breasting 6 EA
Dolphins and Catwalks
Phase 3 North Berth Complete May 2015
Table 5 North Berth Design Elements
Structural Element
Size (+/- 10%)
Approach Dock
4,200 SF
Vehicle Transfer Bridge
140' x 24'
Bridge Support Float
25' x 30'
Bridge Landing
50' x 40'
Concrete Floating Dock
50' x 300'
Mooring and Breasting 6 EA
Dolphins and Catwalks
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The proposed project design is a combination of fixed and
floating docks, both of which require steel piles to support or anchor these
structures. The floating docks would be manufactured offsite, towed to the site and
field installed. The overall in-water work would be significantly shortened by this
- 2 -
process. The primary type of pile that would be used at the site would be hollow
steel pipe piles. The means of installation would vary with specific locations and
would include rock anchors, pin piles, or rock sockets as necessary. The piles
would be driven to bedrock or as deep into existing soils as necessary to resist the
design loads. Rock anchor and pin pile installation would be similar in that a
smaller diameter hole would be drilled into the bedrock underneath the pile, and an
anchor rod or small diameter pin pile would be grouted into the hole. Then the
annulus between the pile and the anchor rod or pin pile would be also grouted to
transfer load between the pile and the anchor rod or pin pile. A rock socket
consists of a hole drilled into bedrock. The structural pile would then be driven
into the hole to provide a stable base and provide a higher level of uplift and
lateral resistance. The means with which piles would be installed would need to be
evaluated on a case-by-case basis. The applicant supports the use of vibratory pile
driving equipment as the primary installation method for the project, impact hammers
would only be allowed for piles that encounter soils too dense to penetrate with the
vibratory equipment, however, bedrock conditions are anticipated.
APPLICANT PROPOSED MITIGATION: The applicant has made the following statements
concerning mitigation measures to avoid, minimize, and compensate for impacts to
waters of the United States from activities involving discharges of dredged or fill
material.
a. Avoidance: "This project utilizes pile supported and floating structures
to the maximum extent possible. One small concrete retaining wall is required along
the upper elevation of an existing slope to replace two existing dilapidated timber
walls. Inherently, impacts to the waters of the U.S. will occur by placing fill for
the retaining wall. The project includes removing two existing timber retaining
walls and replacing them with a concrete retaining wall."
b. Minimization: "The design has been optimized to minimize any impacts
beyond what is required to construct the retaining wall associated with the CBJ
Downtown Cruise Ship Docks project. While the existing fill slope at the site varies
from approximately 1:4 to 1:9 (H:V), the project design incorporates the use of a
concrete retaining wall with a rip rap slope at the base of the wall designed at
1.5:1 to minimize fill quantities as much as practicable while still meeting the
intended purpose and need."
c. Compensatory Mitigation: "Placement of fill and impacts to waters of the
U.S. are minor, approximately 0.049 acres below the HTL. The purpose of the fill is
to prevent erosion and provide slope stability, no additional mitigation measures
are being proposed."
WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION: A permit for the described work will not be issued
until a certification or waiver of certification, as required under Section 401 of
the Clean Water Act (Public Law 95-217), has been received from the Alaska
Department of Environmental Conservation.
CULTURAL RESOURCES: The latest published version of the Alaska Heritage Resources
Survey (AHRS) has been consulted for the presence or absence of historic
properties, including those listed in or eligible for inclusion in the National
Register of Historic Places. There is an unevaluated property in the vicinity of
the worksite. It has been designated JUN-314. There are also registered or
eligible properties in the vicinity of the worksite. They have been designated
JUN-00376, JUN-00118, JUN-00374, JUN-00212, and JUN-00373. Because these properties
have been determined to be outside of the project area, we have determined that
there would be no effect to historic properties. Consultation of the AHRS
constitutes the extent of cultural resource investigations by the District
Commander at this time. This application is being coordinated with SHPO. Any
comments SHPO may have concerning presently unknown archeological or historic data
that may be lost or destroyed by work under the requested permit will be considered
in our final assessment of the described work.
- 3 -
ENDANGERED SPECIES: The project area is within the known or historic range of the
Humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) and Steller sea lion (Eumetopias jubatus).
Preliminarily, we have determined the described activity would have no effect on
any listed or proposed threatened or endangered species, and would have no effect
on any designated or proposed critical habitat, under the Endangered Species Act of
1973 (87 Stat. 844). This application is being coordinated with the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). Any comments
they may have concerning endangered or threatened wildlife or plants or their
critical habitat will be considered in our final assessment of the described work.
ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT: The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management
Act, as amended by the Sustainable Fisheries Act of 1996, requires all Federal
agencies to consult with the NMFS on all actions, or proposed actions, permitted,
funded, or undertaken by the agency, that may adversely affect Essential Fish
Habitat (EFH).
The project area is within the known range of the Chinook (Oncorhynchus
tshawytscha), chum (Oncorhynchus keta), Coho (Oncorhynchus kisutch), pink
(Oncorhynchus gorbuscha), and sockeye (Oncorhynchus nerka) salmon, and the
following species of groundfish: Arrowtooth flounder (Atheresthes stomias),
flathead sole (Hippoglossoides elassodon), rex sole (Glyptocephalus zachirus), rock
sole (Lepidopsetta polyxystra and L. bilineata), Dover sole (Microstomus
pacificus), dusky rockfish (Sebastes ciliates), Pacific cod (Gadus macrocephalus),
Pacific ocean perch (Sebastes alutus), shortraker rockfish (Sebastes borealis),
rougheye rockfish (Sebastes aleutianus), sablefish (Anoplopoma fimbria), skates
(Raja binoculata and R. rhina), walleye Pollock (Theragra chalcogramma), yelloweye
rockfish (Sebastes ruberrimus), and sculpins (Cottidae spp.).
Preliminarily, we have determined the described activity may adversely affect EFH
in the project area for the following species: Chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha),
chum (Oncorhynchus keta), Coho (Oncorhynchus kisutch), pink (Oncorhynchus
gorbuscha), and sockeye (Oncorhynchus nerka) salmon. The proposed project location
is nearshore shallow water habitat primarily for adult and juvenile salmon
migration, as these waters provide refuge from predators and opportunity to rest.
The proposed project would extend a portion of the shoreline into deeper water and
involve pile driving, which may increase salmon mortality, particularly juveniles,
through predation. This Public Notice initiates EFH consultation with the NMFS.
Any comments or recommendations they may have concerning EFH will be considered in
our final assessment of the described work.
TRIBAL CONSULTATION: The Alaska District fully supports tribal self-governance and
government-to-government relations between Federally recognized Tribes and the
Federal government. Tribes with protected rights or resources that could be
significantly affected by a proposed Federal action (e.g., a permit decision) have
the right to consult with the Alaska District on a government-to-government basis.
Views of each Tribe regarding protected rights and resources will be accorded due
consideration in this process. This Public Notice serves as notification to the
Tribes within the area potentially affected by the proposed work and invites their
participation in the Federal decision-making process regarding the protected Tribal
right or resource. Consultation may be initiated by the affected Tribe upon
written request to the District Commander during the public comment period.
PUBLIC HEARING: Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period
specified in this notice, that a public hearing be held to consider this
application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with particularity, reasons
for holding a public hearing.
EVALUATION: The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation
of the probable impacts, including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity and
- 4 -
its intended use on the public interest. Evaluation of the probable impacts, which
the proposed activity may have on the public interest, requires a careful weighing
of all the factors that become relevant in each particular case. The benefits,
which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal, must be balanced
against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. The outcome of the general
balancing process would determine whether to authorize a proposal, and if so, the
conditions under which it will be allowed to occur. The decision should reflect
the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources.
All factors, which may be relevant to the proposal, must be considered including
the cumulative effects thereof. Among those are conservation, economics,
aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and
wildlife values, flood hazards, floodplain values, land use, navigation, shore
erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality,
energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of
property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For
activities involving 404 discharges, a permit will be denied if the discharge that
would be authorized by such permit would not comply with the Environmental
Protection Agency's 404(b)(l) guidelines. Subject to the preceding sentence and
any other applicable guidelines or criteria (see Sections 320.2 and 320.3), a
permit will be granted unless the District Commander determines that it would be
contrary to the public interest.
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State, and
local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes; and other interested parties in order
to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments
received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to determine whether to
issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this
decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic
properties, water quality, general environmental effects, and the other public
interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an
Environmental Assessment and/or an Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the
National Environmental Policy Act. Comments are also used to determine the need
for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed
activity.
AUTHORITY:
This permit will be issued or denied under the following authorities:
(X) Perform work in or affecting navigable waters of the United States
Section 10 Rivers and Harbors Act 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403).
(X) Discharge dredged or fill material into waters of the United States
Section 404 Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). Therefore, our public interest
review will consider the guidelines set forth under Section 404(b) of the Clean
Water Act (40 CFR 230).
Project drawings and a Notice of Application for State Water Quality Certification
are enclosed with this Public Notice.
District Commander
U.S. Army, Corps of Engineers
Enclosures
- 5 -
SEAN PARNELL, GOVERNOR
STATE OF ALASKA
DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
DIVISION OF WATER
401 Certification Program
Non-Point Source Water Pollution Control Program
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
WQM/401 CERTIFICATION
410 WILLOUGHBY AVENUE
JUNEAU, ALASKA 99801-1795
PHONE: (907) 465-5321/FAX: (907) 465-5274
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
FOR
STATE WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
Any applicant for a federal license or permit to conduct an activity that
might result in a discharge into navigable waters, in accordance with Section
401 of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (PL95-217), also must apply for and obtain
certification from the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation that
the discharge will comply with the Clean Water Act, the Alaska Water Quality
Standards, and other applicable State laws. By agreement between the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers and the Department of Environmental Conservation,
application for a Department of the Army permit to discharge dredged or fill
material into navigable waters under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act also
may serve as application for State Water Quality Certification.
Notice is hereby given that the application for a Department of the Army
Permit described in the Corps of Engineers' Public Notice No. POA-2011-294,
Gastineau Channel, serves as application for State Water Quality
Certification from the Department of Environmental Conservation.
After reviewing the application, the Department may certify there is
reasonable assurance the activity, and any discharge that might result, will
comply with the Clean Water Act, the Alaska Water Quality Standards, and
other applicable State laws. The Department also may deny or waive
certification.
Any person desiring to comment on the project, with respect to Water Quality
Certification, may submit written comments to the address above by the
expiration date of the Corps of Engineer's Public Notice.
SKAGWAY
HAINES
DOWNTOWN
JUNEAU
JUNEAU /
DOUGLAS
BRIDGE
SITKA
PETERSBURG
AS
G
KAKE
N
TI
WRANGELL
U
EA
CRAIG
CBJ
DOWNTOWN
CRUISE
SHIP
DOCK
KETCHIKAN
EL
N
AN
H
C
JUNEAU
ROCK
DUMP
SCALE IN MILES
DOUGLAS
0
PURPOSE:
TO IMPROVE ACCESS, SECURITY, BERTHING
CAPACITY AND SAFETY AT THE CBJ DOWNTOWN
CRUISE SHIP DOCKS.
1
1
2
CBJ DOWNTOWN
CRUISE SHIP DOCKS
RECONFIGURATION
VICINITY MAP
LOCATION MAP
IN:
APPLICANT ADDRESS:
DATUM:
MLLW = 0.0 FT
HTL = 20.8'
MHW = 15.4'
MLLW = 0.0'
CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU
DOCKS & HARBOR DEPT.
155 S. SEWARD STREET
JUNEAU, AK 99801
PND#: 102050.01
GASTINEAU CHANNEL
NEAR: JUNEAU
DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS
AT:
APPLICATION BY: CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU
DATE:
AUGUST 2011
SHEET 1
OF 14
MERCHANTS
WHARF
EGA
N DR
.
MA
RIN
HTL = 20.8
MHW = 15.4
MLLW = 0
EW
AY
MARINE
PARK
SEAPLANE
FLOAT
CBJ
PARKING
GARAGE
AL
LIGHTERING
FLOAT
AS
KA
ST
EA
M
SH
IP
DO
CK
ATS 3
BOUNDARY
SO
'
00
UT
10
H
TRAM PLAZA
FR
AN
KL
SEWER
FORCE
MAIN
IN
ST
CR
UI
CBJ DOCKS
CRUISE SHIP TERMINAL
STAGING AREA
SE
SH
FISHERMEN'S
MEMORIAL
IP
TE
RM
TAKU
SMOKERIES/
FISHERIES
IN
AL
PORT
CUSTOMS
BLDG
MINERS
COVE
SEAWALK
'
00
10
TAKU
FISHERIES
DOCK
AS
G
EA
N
TI
INTERMEDIATE
VESSEL
FLOAT
U
MINERS
COVE
EL
N
AN
H
C
PURPOSE:
SOUTH
FRANKLIN
DOCK
SCALE IN FEET
0
500
APPLICANT ADDRESS:
DATUM:
MLLW = 0.0 FT
HTL = 20.8'
MHW = 15.4'
MLLW = 0.0'
CBJ DOWNTOWN
CRUISE SHIP DOCKS
RECONFIGURATION
EXISTING CONDITIONS
SITE PLAN
TO IMPROVE ACCESS, SECURITY, BERTHING
CAPACITY AND SAFETY AT THE CBJ DOWNTOWN
CRUISE SHIP DOCKS.
CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU
DOCKS & HARBOR DEPT.
155 S. SEWARD STREET
JUNEAU, AK 99801
PND#: 102050.01
1000
IN:
GASTINEAU CHANNEL
NEAR: JUNEAU
DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS
AT:
APPLICATION BY: CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU
DATE:
AUGUST 2011
SHEET 2
OF 14
HTL = 20.8
MHW = 15.4
MLLW = 0
-10
-40
-20
-30
-50
-40
-50
-40
-50
HTL = 20.8
MHW = 15.4
MLLW = 0
-60
-70
-80
-90
-90
FM
-50
-20
-60
00
10
'
PROPOSED
NORTH BERTH
BOUNDARY,
SEE SHEET 4
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL,
MOORAGE FLOAT AND
TAKU SMOKERIES IMPROVEMENTS,
SEE SHEETS 6 & 7.
-90
0
-40
-5
-80
-70
0
-6
FM
HTL = 20.8
MHW = 15.4
MLLW = 0
-70
0
-3
0
-4
0
-5
0
-6
PROPOSED
SOUTH BERTH
BOUNDARY,
SEE SHEET 5
-20
-100
-30
00
10
'
-70
-80
-70
-100
-90
-80
-90
-100
-100
-1
00
G
-100
AS
-100
FM
U
EA
N
TI
H
C
00
-20
N
AN
-1
-100
EL
-100
-30
FM
-40
0
-8
-90
-40
-80
-30
-8
-30
0
-30
-4
0
-70
-50
0
-6
-70
0
-7
PURPOSE:
SCALE IN FEET
0
500
APPLICANT ADDRESS:
DATUM:
MLLW = 0.0 FT
HTL = 20.8'
MHW = 15.4'
MLLW = 0.0'
CBJ DOWNTOWN
CRUISE SHIP DOCKS
RECONFIGURATION
PROPOSED
SITE PLAN
TO IMPROVE ACCESS, SECURITY, BERTHING
CAPACITY AND SAFETY AT THE CBJ DOWNTOWN
CRUISE SHIP DOCKS.
CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU
DOCKS & HARBOR DEPT.
155 S. SEWARD STREET
JUNEAU, AK 99801
PND#: 102050.01
1000
IN:
GASTINEAU CHANNEL
NEAR: JUNEAU
DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS
AT:
APPLICATION BY: CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU
DATE:
AUGUST 2011
SHEET 3
OF 14
EGAN
HTL = 20.8
MHW = 15.4
MLLW = 0
DR.
MERCHANTS
WHARF
NEW
APPROACH
DOCK
w/ SECURITY
GATE
MA
MARINE
PARK
RIN
EW
AY
EXISTING
SEAPLANE
FLOAT
EXISTING
CBJ DOCK
NEW
BRIDGE
SUPPORT
FLOAT
CBJ
PARKING
GARGAGE
B
H
UT
SO
C
FR
AN
HTL = 20.8
MHW = 15.4
MLLW = 0
B
KL
IN
ST
C
D
NEW VEHICLE
TRANSFER
BRIDGE
NEW BRIDGE
LANDING
D
'
00
10
STRUCTURE SUMMARY (NORTH BERTH)
STRUCTURE
SIZE
# OF PILES
PILE Ø
APPROACH DOCK
4,200 SF
16
16"
VEHICLE TRANSFER BRIDGE
140' X 24'
8
16'
BRIDGE SUPPORT FLOAT
25' X 30'
-
-
BRIDGE LANDING
50' X 40'
-
-
CONCRETE FLOATING DOCK
50' X 300'
10
48"
MOORING & BREASTING
DOLPHINS
6 EA
24
48"
PURPOSE:
NEW CONCRETE
FLOATING DOCK
E
NEW MOORING
& BREASTING
DOLPHINS,
SEE SHEET 10
H
TC
MA INE
L
200
APPLICANT ADDRESS:
MLLW = 0.0 FT
CBJ DOWNTOWN
CRUISE SHIP DOCKS
RECONFIGURATION
SCALE IN FEET
0
DATUM:
4
T
EE T 5
H
S
EE
SH
NORTH BERTH
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
TO IMPROVE ACCESS, SECURITY, BERTHING
CAPACITY AND SAFETY AT THE CBJ DOWNTOWN
CRUISE SHIP DOCKS.
HTL = 20.8'
MHW = 15.4'
MLLW = 0.0'
E
CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU
DOCKS & HARBOR DEPT.
155 S. SEWARD STREET
JUNEAU, AK 99801
PND#: 102050.01
400
IN:
GASTINEAU CHANNEL
NEAR: JUNEAU
DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS
AT:
APPLICATION BY: CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU
DATE:
AUGUST 2011
SHEET 4
OF 14
HTL = 20.8
MHW = 15.4
MLLW = 0
EXISTING
CBJ DOCK
4
T
EE T 5
H
S
EE
SH
SO
UT
H
NEW
APPROACH
DOCK W/
SECURITY
GATE
H
TC
MA INE
L
FR
AN
KL
IN
ST
SEE SHEETS
6&7
CRUISE SHIP
TERMINAL
STAGING AREA
NEW VEHICLE
TRANSFER BRIDGE
TAKU
SMOKERIES/
FISHERIES
BLDG
NEW BRIDGE
SUPPORT FLOAT
NEW BRIDGE
LANDING
NEW CONCRETE
FLOATING DOCK
MINERS
COVE
SEAWALK
00
10
'
INTERMEDIATE
VESSEL
FLOAT
STRUCTURE SUMMARY (SOUTH BERTH)
STRUCTURE
SIZE
# OF PILES
PILE Ø
APPROACH DOCK
7,000 SF
36
16"
VEHICLE TRANSFER BRIDGE
140' X 24'
8
16"
BRIDGE SUPPORT FLOAT
25' X 30'
-
-
BRIDGE LANDING
50' X 40'
-
-
CONCRETE FLOATING DOCK
50' X 400'
10
48"
MOORING AND BREASTING
DOLPHINS
6 EA
27
48"
PURPOSE:
NEW MOORING &
BREASTING DOLPHINS,
SEE SHEET 9
SCALE IN FEET
0
200
APPLICANT ADDRESS:
DATUM:
MLLW = 0.0 FT
HTL = 20.8'
MHW = 15.4'
MLLW = 0.0'
CBJ DOWNTOWN
CRUISE SHIP DOCKS
RECONFIGURATION
SOUTH BERTH
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
TO IMPROVE ACCESS, SECURITY, BERTHING
CAPACITY AND SAFETY AT THE CBJ DOWNTOWN
CRUISE SHIP DOCKS.
CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU
DOCKS & HARBOR DEPT.
155 S. SEWARD STREET
JUNEAU, AK 99801
PND#: 102050.01
400
IN:
GASTINEAU CHANNEL
NEAR: JUNEAU
DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS
AT:
APPLICATION BY: CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU
DATE:
AUGUST 2011
SHEET 5
OF 14
HTL = 20.8
MHW = 15.4
MLLW = 0
REMOVE
TRANSFER BRIDGE
EXISTING
CBJ DOCK
SO
TRAM
PLAZA
BLDG
TO REMAIN
CRUISE SHIP
TERMINAL
STAGING AREA
UT
H
FR
AN
KL
IN
ST
DEMO PORTION OF
SOUTH FERRY DOCK
EXISTING DOCK
TO REMAIN
PORT CUSTOMS BLDG
TO REMAIN
FISHERMEN'S
MEMORIAL
TAKU SMOKERIES/
FISHERIES BLDG
REMOVE DOLPHINS
& CATWALKS, TYP.
HTL = 20.8
MHW = 15.4
MLLW = 0
DEMOLITION SUMMARY
SIZE
NO. OF PILES
PILE Ø
TRANSFER BRIDGE
2,600 SF
12 (STEEL)
12" (8)
24" (4)
SOUTH FERRY DOCK
7,250 SF
120 (TIMBER)
DOLPHINS & ASSOC. CATWALKS
6 EA @ 300LF
22
10
STRUCTURE
TAKU
FISHERIES
DOCK
TO REMAIN
MINERS
COVE
SEAWALK
EXISTING
INTERMEDIATE
VESSEL
FLOAT
12"
00
VARIES
'
PURPOSE:
TO IMPROVE ACCESS, SECURITY, BERTHING
CAPACITY AND SAFETY AT THE CBJ DOWNTOWN
CRUISE SHIP DOCKS.
SCALE IN FEET
0
100
APPLICANT ADDRESS:
DATUM:
MLLW = 0.0 FT
HTL = 20.8'
MHW = 15.4'
MLLW = 0.0'
CBJ DOWNTOWN
CRUISE SHIP DOCKS
RECONFIGURATION
TRANSFER BRIDGE
PROPOSED DEMOLITION PLAN
CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU
DOCKS & HARBOR DEPT.
155 S. SEWARD STREET
JUNEAU, AK 99801
PND#: 102050.01
200
IN:
GASTINEAU CHANNEL
NEAR: JUNEAU
DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS
AT:
APPLICATION BY: CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU
DATE:
AUGUST 2011
SHEET 6
OF 14
HTL = 20.8
MHW = 15.4
H
MLLW = 0
NEW CONCRETE
RETAINING WALL
AND FILL
G
EXISTING
CBJ DOCK
SOUTH
FERRY
DOCK
G
SO
TRAM
PLAZA
BLDG
CRUISE SHIP
TERMINAL
STAGING AREA
UT
H
FR
AN
KL
IN
ST
H
NEW DOCK ADDITION,
APPROX. 11,000 SF
NEW GANGWAY
A
NEW CONCRETE
MOORAGE FLOAT
A
PORT
CUSTOMS
BLDG
FISHERMEN'S
MEMORIAL
STRUCTURE SUMMARY (RETAINING WALL AND TAKU
SMOKERIES DOCK)
TAKU SMOKERIES/
FISHERIES BLDG
SIZE
# OF PILES
PILE Ø
CONCRETE RETAINING WALL
AND FILL
75 LF X
1'-3" WIDE
9
24"
NEW DOCK ADDITION
11,000 SF
2, 34
16", 12.75"
CONCRETE MOORAGE
FLOAT
16' X 250'
9
16"
GANGWAY
8' X 120'
-
-
8
16"
NEW WORK DECK ADDITION
1,000 SF
F
NEW WORK DECK
ADDITION &
MOORING PILE
MINERS
COVE
SEAWALK
SUMMARY OF FILL QUANTITIES
TOTAL
PROJECT
QTY
QTY BELOW
HTL
QTY
SEAWARD
MHW
FILL
700 CY
200 CY
400 CY
BASE COURSE
20 CY
20 CY
20 CY
RIP RAP
50 CY
50 CY
50 CY
EXCAVATION
100 CY
0 CY
0 CY
EXISTING
INTERMEDIATE
VESSEL
FLOAT
'
00
10
MATERIAL
PURPOSE:
SCALE IN FEET
0
100
APPLICANT ADDRESS:
DATUM:
MLLW = 0.0 FT
HTL = 20.8'
MHW = 15.4'
MLLW = 0.0'
CBJ DOWNTOWN
CRUISE SHIP DOCKS
RECONFIGURATION
TRANSFER BRIDGE
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
TO IMPROVE ACCESS, SECURITY, BERTHING
CAPACITY AND SAFETY AT THE CBJ DOWNTOWN
CRUISE SHIP DOCKS.
HTL = 20.8
MHW = 15.4
MLLW = 0
TAKU
FISHERIES
DOCK
F
STRUCTURE
CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU
DOCKS & HARBOR DEPT.
155 S. SEWARD STREET
JUNEAU, AK 99801
PND#: 102050.01
200
IN:
GASTINEAU CHANNEL
NEAR: JUNEAU
DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS
AT:
APPLICATION BY: CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU
DATE:
AUGUST 2011
SHEET 7
OF 14
TOP OF PILE
ELEV. +30' ±
GANGWAY
EXISTING DOCK
TO REMAIN
TOP OF DOCK
ELEV. +25' ±
HTL
ELEV. +20.8
MHW
ELEV. +15.4'
16' x 250' CONCRETE FLOAT
MLLW
ELEV. +0.0'
16'
APPROX.
GROUND LINE
APPROX.
BEDROCK
SECTION A-A
PURPOSE:
CBJ DOWNTOWN
CRUISE SHIP DOCKS
RECONFIGURATION
SECTIONS
TO IMPROVE ACCESS, SECURITY, BERTHING
CAPACITY AND SAFETY AT THE CBJ DOWNTOWN
CRUISE SHIP DOCKS.
IN:
APPLICANT ADDRESS:
DATUM:
MLLW = 0.0 FT
HTL = 20.8'
MHW = 15.4'
MLLW = 0.0'
CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU
DOCKS & HARBOR DEPT.
155 S. SEWARD STREET
JUNEAU, AK 99801
PND#: 102050.01
GASTINEAU CHANNEL
NEAR: JUNEAU
DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS
AT:
APPLICATION BY: CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU
DATE:
AUGUST 2011
SHEET 8
OF 14
VARIES
EXISTING DOCK
TO REMAIN
0' TO 100'±
BULLRAIL
TIMBER
DECK
TOP OF DECK
ELEV. +25' ±
TOP OF PIER
ELEV. +25'±
HTL
ELEV. +20.8'
STEEL PILE
CAP
MHW
ELEV. +15.4'
MLLW
ELEV. +0.0'
STEEL PIPE
PILE, TYP.
APPROX.
GROUNDLINE
APPROX.
BEDROCK
SECTION B-B
NEW
PIER
14 0'
MHW
ELEV. +15.4'
HTL
ELEV. +20.8'
TRANSFER
BRIDGE
MLLW
ELEV. +0.0'
FLOATING
DOCK
SECTION C-C
PURPOSE:
CBJ DOWNTOWN
CRUISE SHIP DOCKS
RECONFIGURATION
SECTIONS
TO IMPROVE ACCESS, SECURITY, BERTHING
CAPACITY AND SAFETY AT THE CBJ DOWNTOWN
CRUISE SHIP DOCKS.
IN:
APPLICANT ADDRESS:
DATUM:
MLLW = 0.0 FT
HTL = 20.8'
MHW = 15.4'
MLLW = 0.0'
CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU
DOCKS & HARBOR DEPT.
155 S. SEWARD STREET
JUNEAU, AK 99801
PND#: 102050.01
GASTINEAU CHANNEL
NEAR: JUNEAU
DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS
AT:
APPLICATION BY: CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU
DATE:
AUGUST 2011
SHEET
9 OF 14
50'
PEDESTRIAN
GUARDRAIL
40'-0"
REMOVABLE
COMBINATION
VEHICULAR AND
PEDESTRIAN BARRIER
24'-0"
STEEL VEHICLE
TRANSFER BRIDGE
FLOATING
CONCRETE
DOCK
FOAM FILLED
MARINE FENDER
FLOATING CONCRETE
BRIDGE LANDING
8'-0"
FREEBOARD
SECTION D-D
CATWALK
QUICK RELEASE MOORING
HOOK NOT SHOWN
DOLPHIN CAP
TOP OF DECK
ELEV. +30'±
TOP OF PILE
ELEV. +24'±
MHHW
ELEV. +15.4'
MLLW
ELEV. +0.0'
FOAM FILLED
MARINE FENDER
DROP ON FENDER
FRAME
STEEL PIPE
PILE, TYP.
STEEL PIPE
FENDER PILE, TYP.
APPROX.
GROUNDLINE
APPROX.
BEDROCK
SECTION E-E
PURPOSE:
CBJ DOWNTOWN
CRUISE SHIP DOCKS
RECONFIGURATION
SECTIONS
TO IMPROVE ACCESS, SECURITY, BERTHING
CAPACITY AND SAFETY AT THE CBJ DOWNTOWN
CRUISE SHIP DOCKS.
IN:
APPLICANT ADDRESS:
DATUM:
MLLW = 0.0 FT
HTL = 20.8'
MHW = 15.4'
MLLW = 0.0'
CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU
DOCKS & HARBOR DEPT.
155 S. SEWARD STREET
JUNEAU, AK 99801
PND#: 102050.01
GASTINEAU CHANNEL
NEAR: JUNEAU
DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS
AT:
APPLICATION BY: CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU
DATE:
AUGUST 2011
SHEET 10 OF 14
TIMBER
DECK
BULLRAIL
VARIES
0' TO 100'±
EXISTING DOCK
TO REMAIN
TOP OF DECK
ELEV. +25' ±
TOP OF DOCK
ELEV. +25'±
HTL
ELEV. +20.8'
STEEL PILE
CAP
MHW
ELEV. +15.4'
STEEL PIPE
PILE, TYP.
MLLW
ELEV. +0.0'
STEEL PIPE
FENDER, TYP.
APPROX.
GROUNDLINE
APPROX.
BEDROCK
SECTION F-F
PURPOSE:
CBJ DOWNTOWN
CRUISE SHIP DOCKS
RECONFIGURATION
SECTIONS
TO IMPROVE ACCESS, SECURITY, BERTHING
CAPACITY AND SAFETY AT THE CBJ DOWNTOWN
CRUISE SHIP DOCKS.
IN:
APPLICANT ADDRESS:
DATUM:
MLLW = 0.0 FT
HTL = 20.8'
MHW = 15.4'
MLLW = 0.0'
CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU
DOCKS & HARBOR DEPT.
155 S. SEWARD STREET
JUNEAU, AK 99801
PND#: 102050.01
GASTINEAU CHANNEL
NEAR: JUNEAU
DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS
AT:
APPLICATION BY: CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU
DATE:
AUGUST 2011
SHEET 11 OF 14
MLLW
ELEV. +0.0'
MHW
ELEV. +15.4'
HTL
ELEV. +20.8'
TO IMPROVE ACCESS, SECURITY, BERTHING
CAPACITY AND SAFETY AT THE CBJ DOWNTOWN
CRUISE SHIP DOCKS.
STEEL
BATTER
PILE,
TYP
CBJ DOWNTOWN
CRUISE SHIP DOCKS
RECONFIGURATION
PORT CUSTOMS
DOCK SECTION
IN:
APPLICANT ADDRESS:
DATUM:
MLLW = 0.0 FT
HTL = 20.8'
MHW = 15.4'
MLLW = 0.0'
CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU
DOCKS & HARBOR DEPT.
155 S. SEWARD STREET
JUNEAU, AK 99801
PND#: 102050.01
EXISTING
GROUND
EXISTING
WALL
CONCRETE
DECK
STEEL
VERTICAL
PILE,
TYP
SECTION H-H
STEEL
PILE
CAP
TOP OF DECK
ELEV. +25' ±
TIMBER
GLU-LAM
STRINGER
TIMBER
DECK
PURPOSE:
GASTINEAU CHANNEL
NEAR: JUNEAU
DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS
AT:
APPLICATION BY: CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU
DATE:
AUGUST 2011
SHEET 13 OF 14
STEEL PIPE
PILE, TYP.
GROUNDLINE
PILE TIP
AS REQ'D
BEDROCK
DRIVEN PILE
DRILLED AND
GROUTED PIPE
PIN PILE
DRILLED SOCKET
SIMILAR IN
SIZE TO PILE
DRILLED AND
GROUTED ROD
PIN PILE
PILE SOCKET
NOTE:
STEEL PIPE PILE TIPS FOR THIS PROJECT
WILL BE INSTALLED PER ONE OF THE
METHODS DEPICTED ON THIS SHEET. ACTUAL
METHOD TO BE DETERMINED AS SUBSURFACE
CONDITIONS BECOME KNOWN. ALL PILES
DRIVEN TO IMPACT HAMMER REFUSAL
PURPOSE:
ROCK ANCHOR
CBJ DOWNTOWN
CRUISE SHIP DOCKS
RECONFIGURATION
PILE DETAILS
TO IMPROVE ACCESS, SECURITY, BERTHING
CAPACITY AND SAFETY AT THE CBJ DOWNTOWN
CRUISE SHIP DOCKS.
IN:
APPLICANT ADDRESS:
DATUM:
MLLW = 0.0 FT
HTL = 20.8'
MHW = 15.4'
MLLW = 0.0'
CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU
DOCKS & HARBOR DEPT.
155 S. SEWARD STREET
JUNEAU, AK 99801
PND#: 102050.01
GASTINEAU CHANNEL
NEAR: JUNEAU
DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS
AT:
APPLICATION BY: CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU
DATE:
AUGUST 2011
SHEET 14 OF 14