Home

Alaska District

Run scraper

City and Borough of Juneau

Basic information

Fill out these two fields at minimum.

— or —

How Big?

Where?

Links to source documents

Raw text

You can copy from here when filling out the rest of the page.

Interested parties are hereby notified that a Department of the Army permit application has been

Interested parties are hereby notified that a Department of the Army permit application has been received for work in waters of the United States as described below and shown on the enclosed project drawings. Comments on the described work, with the reference number, should reach this office no later than the expiration date of this Public Notice to become part of the record and be considered in the decision. Please contact Randal Vigil at (907) 790-4491 or by email at Randal.P.Vigil@usace.army.mil if further information is desired concerning this notice. APPLICANT: City and Borough of Juneau, Docks and Harbors Department, 155 South Seward Street, Juneau, Alaska 99801. City and Borough of Juneau, Docks and Harbors Department, 155 South Seward Street, Juneau, Alaska 99801. AGENT: PND Engineers, Inc., 9360 Glacier Highway, Suite 100, Juneau, Alaska 99801. PND Engineers, Inc., 9360 Glacier Highway, Suite 100, Juneau, Alaska 99801. LOCATION: The project site is located within Section 23, T. 41 S., R. 67 E., Copper Meridian; USGS Quad Map Juneau B-2; Latitude 58.296º N., Longitude 134.402º W.; Alaska Tidelands Survey 3; at the Smokeries dock, the Alaska Steamship Wharf and the Cruise Ship Terminal, in Juneau, Alaska. The project site is located within Section 23, T. 41 S., R. 67 E., Copper Meridian; USGS Quad Map Juneau B-2; Latitude 58.296º N., Longitude 134.402º W.; Alaska Tidelands Survey 3; at the Smokeries dock, the Alaska Steamship Wharf and the Cruise Ship Terminal, in Juneau, Alaska. PURPOSE: The applicant’s stated purpose is to expand the “Smokeries dock, and improve access, security, berthing capacity, and safety at the City and Borough of Juneau’s Downtown Cruise Ship Docks.” The applicant’s stated purpose is to expand the “Smokeries dock, and improve access, security, berthing capacity, and safety at the City and Borough of Juneau’s Downtown Cruise Ship Docks.” PROPOSED WORK: The applicant requests authorization for the following work in waters and navigable waters of the United States: 1. Discharge approximately 200cubic yards of fill material into approximately 0.049 acres below the high tide line (approximate elevation +20.8 feet above the 0.0 foot contour) to construction a retaining wall. 2. Construct below the Mean High Water mark (approximate elevation +15.4 feet above the 0.0 foot contour) (MHW) two offshore cruise ship The applicant requests authorization for the following work in waters and navigable waters of the United States: 1. Discharge approximately 200cubic yards of fill material into approximately 0.049 acres below the high tide line (approximate elevation +20.8 feet above the 0.0 foot contour) to construction a retaining wall. 2. Construct below the Mean High Water mark (approximate elevation +15.4 feet above the 0.0 foot contour) (MHW) two offshore cruise ship berths. Refer to the below impact tables for details, including the removal of the existing South Ferry Dock, transfer bridge, and associated dolphins and catwalks. All work would be performed in accordance with the enclosed plan (sheets 1-14), dated August 2011. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The proposed project design is a combination of fixed and floating docks, both of which require steel piles to support or anchor these structures. The floating docks would be manufactured offsite, towed to the site and field installed. The overall in-water work would be significantly shortened by this process. The primary type of pile that would be used at the site would be hollow steel pipe piles. The means of installation would vary with specific locations and would include rock anchors, pin piles, or rock sockets as necessary. The piles would be driven to bedrock or as deep into existing soils as necessary to resist the design loads. Rock anchor and pin pile installation would be similar in that a smaller diameter hole would be drilled into the bedrock underneath the pile, and an anchor rod or small diameter pin pile would be grouted into the hole. Then the annulus between the pile and the anchor rod or pin pile would be also grouted to transfer load between the pile and the anchor rod or pin pile. A rock socket consists of a hole drilled into bedrock. The structural pile would then be driven into the hole to provide a stable base and provide a higher level of uplift and lateral resistance. The means with which piles would be installed would need to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. The applicant supports the use of vibratory pile driving equipment as the primary installation method for the project, impact hammers would only be allowed for piles that encounter soils too dense to penetrate with the vibratory equipment, however, bedrock conditions are anticipated. The proposed project design is a combination of fixed and floating docks, both of which require steel piles to support or anchor these structures. The floating docks would be manufactured offsite, towed to the site and field installed. The overall in-water work would be significantly shortened by this process. The primary type of pile that would be used at the site would be hollow steel pipe piles. The means of installation would vary with specific locations and would include rock anchors, pin piles, or rock sockets as necessary. The piles would be driven to bedrock or as deep into existing soils as necessary to resist the design loads. Rock anchor and pin pile installation would be similar in that a smaller diameter hole would be drilled into the bedrock underneath the pile, and an anchor rod or small diameter pin pile would be grouted into the hole. Then the annulus between the pile and the anchor rod or pin pile would be also grouted to transfer load between the pile and the anchor rod or pin pile. A rock socket consists of a hole drilled into bedrock. The structural pile would then be driven into the hole to provide a stable base and provide a higher level of uplift and lateral resistance. The means with which piles would be installed would need to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. The applicant supports the use of vibratory pile driving equipment as the primary installation method for the project, impact hammers would only be allowed for piles that encounter soils too dense to penetrate with the vibratory equipment, however, bedrock conditions are anticipated. APPLICANT PROPOSED MITIGATION: The applicant has made the following statements concerning mitigation measures to avoid, minimize, and compensate for impacts to waters of the United States from activities involving discharges of dredged or fill material. The applicant has made the following statements concerning mitigation measures to avoid, minimize, and compensate for impacts to waters of the United States from activities involving discharges of dredged or fill material. a. Avoidance: “This project utilizes pile supported and floating structures to the maximum extent possible. One small concrete retaining wall is required along the upper elevation of an existing slope to replace two existing dilapidated timber walls. Inherently, impacts to the waters of the U.S. will occur by placing fill for the retaining wall. The project includes removing two existing timber retaining walls and replacing them with a concrete retaining wall.” “This project utilizes pile supported and floating structures to the maximum extent possible. One small concrete retaining wall is required along the upper elevation of an existing slope to replace two existing dilapidated timber walls. Inherently, impacts to the waters of the U.S. will occur by placing fill for the retaining wall. The project includes removing two existing timber retaining walls and replacing them with a concrete retaining wall.” b. Minimization: “The design has been optimized to minimize any impacts beyond what is required to construct the retaining wall associated with the CBJ Downtown Cruise Ship Docks project. While the existing fill slope at the site varies from approximately 1:4 to 1:9 (H:V), the project design incorporates the use of a concrete retaining wall with a rip rap slope at the base of the wall designed at 1.5:1 to minimize fill quantities as much as practicable while still meeting the intended purpose and need.” “The design has been optimized to minimize any impacts beyond what is required to construct the retaining wall associated with the CBJ Downtown Cruise Ship Docks project. While the existing fill slope at the site varies from approximately 1:4 to 1:9 (H:V), the project design incorporates the use of a concrete retaining wall with a rip rap slope at the base of the wall designed at 1.5:1 to minimize fill quantities as much as practicable while still meeting the intended purpose and need.” c. Compensatory Mitigation: “Placement of fill and impacts to waters of the U.S. are minor, approximately 0.049 acres below the HTL. The purpose of the fill is to prevent erosion and provide slope stability, no additional mitigation measures are being proposed.” “Placement of fill and impacts to waters of the U.S. are minor, approximately 0.049 acres below the HTL. The purpose of the fill is to prevent erosion and provide slope stability, no additional mitigation measures are being proposed.” WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION: A permit for the described work will not be issued until a certification or waiver of certification, as required under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (Public Law 95-217), has been received from the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation. A permit for the described work will not be issued until a certification or waiver of certification, as required under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (Public Law 95-217), has been received from the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation. CULTURAL RESOURCES: The latest published version of the Alaska Heritage Resources Survey (AHRS) has been consulted for the presence or absence of historic properties, including those listed in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. There is an unevaluated property in the vicinity of the worksite. It has been designated JUN-314. There are also registered or eligible properties in the vicinity of the worksite. They have been designated JUN-00376, JUN-00118, JUN-00374, JUN-00212, and JUN-00373. Because these properties have been determined to be outside of the project area, we have determined that there would be no effect to historic properties. Consultation of the AHRS constitutes the extent of cultural resource investigations by the District Commander at this time. This application is being coordinated with SHPO. Any comments SHPO may have concerning presently unknown archeological or historic data that may be lost or destroyed by work under the requested permit will be considered in our final assessment of the described work. The latest published version of the Alaska Heritage Resources Survey (AHRS) has been consulted for the presence or absence of historic properties, including those listed in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. There is an unevaluated property in the vicinity of the worksite. It has been designated . There are also registered or eligible properties in the vicinity of the worksite. They have been designated Because these properties have been determined to be outside of the project area, we have determined that there would be no effect to historic properties. Consultation of the AHRS constitutes the extent of cultural resource investigations by the District Commander at this time. This application is being coordinated with SHPO. Any comments SHPO may have concerning presently unknown archeological or historic data that may be lost or destroyed by work under the requested permit will be considered in our final assessment of the described work. ENDANGERED SPECIES: The project area is within the known or historic range of the Humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) and Steller sea lion (Eumetopias jubatus). Preliminarily, we have determined the described activity would have no effect on any listed or proposed threatened or endangered species, and would have no effect on any designated or proposed critical habitat, under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (87 Stat. 844). This application is being coordinated with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). Any comments they may have concerning endangered or threatened wildlife or plants or their critical habitat will be considered in our final assessment of the described work. The project area is within the known or historic range of the Humpback whale (and Steller sea lion.) Preliminarily, we have determined the described activity would have no effect on any listed or proposed threatened or endangered species, and would have no effect on any designated or proposed critical habitat, under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (87 Stat. 844). This application is being coordinated with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). Any comments they may have concerning endangered or threatened wildlife or plants or their critical habitat will be considered in our final assessment of the described work. ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT: The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, as amended by the Sustainable Fisheries Act of 1996, requires all Federal agencies to consult with the NMFS on all actions, or proposed actions, permitted, funded, or undertaken by the agency, that may adversely affect Essential Fish Habitat (EFH). The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, as amended by the Sustainable Fisheries Act of 1996, requires all Federal agencies to consult with the NMFS on all actions, or proposed actions, permitted, funded, or undertaken by the agency, that may adversely affect Essential Fish Habitat (EFH). The project area is within the known range of the Chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), chum (Oncorhynchus keta), Coho (Oncorhynchus kisutch), pink (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha), and sockeye (Oncorhynchus nerka) salmon, and the following species of groundfish: Arrowtooth flounder (Atheresthes stomias), flathead sole (Hippoglossoides elassodon), rex sole (Glyptocephalus zachirus), rock sole (Lepidopsetta polyxystra and L. bilineata), Dover sole (Microstomus pacificus), dusky rockfish (Sebastes ciliates), Pacific cod (Gadus macrocephalus), Pacific ocean perch (Sebastes alutus), shortraker rockfish (Sebastes borealis), rougheye rockfish (Sebastes aleutianus), sablefish (Anoplopoma fimbria), skates (Raja binoculata and R. rhina), walleye Pollock (Theragra chalcogramma), yelloweye rockfish (Sebastes ruberrimus), and sculpins (Cottidae spp.). Preliminarily, we have determined the described activity may adversely affect EFH in the project area for the following species: Chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), chum (Oncorhynchus keta), Coho (Oncorhynchus kisutch), pink (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha), and sockeye (Oncorhynchus nerka) salmon. The proposed project location is nearshore shallow water habitat primarily for adult and juvenile salmon migration, as these waters provide refuge from predators and opportunity to rest. The proposed project would extend a portion of the shoreline into deeper water and involve pile driving, which may increase salmon mortality, particularly juveniles, through predation. This Public Notice initiates EFH consultation with the NMFS. Any comments or recommendations they may have concerning EFH will be considered in our final assessment of the described work. TRIBAL CONSULTATION: The Alaska District fully supports tribal self-governance and government-to-government relations between Federally recognized Tribes and the Federal government. Tribes with protected rights or resources that could be significantly affected by a proposed Federal action (e.g., a permit decision) have the right to consult with the Alaska District on a government-to-government basis. Views of each Tribe regarding protected rights and resources will be accorded due consideration in this process. This Public Notice serves as notification to the Tribes within the area potentially affected by the proposed work and invites their participation in the Federal decision-making process regarding the protected Tribal right or resource. Consultation may be initiated by the affected Tribe upon written request to the District Commander during the public comment period. The Alaska District fully supports tribal self-governance and government-to-government relations between Federally recognized Tribes and the Federal government. Tribes with protected rights or resources that could be significantly affected by a proposed Federal action (e.g., a permit decision) have the right to consult with the Alaska District on a government-to-government basis. Views of each Tribe regarding protected rights and resources will be accorded due consideration in this process. This Public Notice serves as notification to the Tribes within the area potentially affected by the proposed work and invites their participation in the Federal decision-making process regarding the protected Tribal right or resource. Consultation may be initiated by the affected Tribe upon written request to the District Commander during the public comment period. PUBLIC HEARING: Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in this notice, that a public hearing be held to consider this application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with particularity, reasons for holding a public hearing. Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in this notice, that a public hearing be held to consider this application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with particularity, reasons for holding a public hearing. EVALUATION: The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts, including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity andits intended use on the public interest. Evaluation of the probable impacts, which the proposed activity may have on the public interest, requires a careful weighing of all the factors that become relevant in each particular case. The benefits, which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal, must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. The outcome of the general balancing process would determine whether to authorize a proposal, and if so, the conditions under which it will be allowed to occur. The decision should reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. All factors, which may be relevant to the proposal, must be considered including the cumulative effects thereof. Among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, floodplain values, land use, navigation, shore erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving 404 discharges, a permit will be denied if the discharge that would be authorized by such permit would not comply with the Environmental Protection Agency's 404(b)(l) guidelines. Subject to the preceding sentence and any other applicable guidelines or criteria (see Sections 320.2 and 320.3), a permit will be granted unless the District Commander determines that it would be contrary to the public interest. The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts, including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity andits intended use on the public interest. Evaluation of the probable impacts, which the proposed activity may have on the public interest, requires a careful weighing of all the factors that become relevant in each particular case. The benefits, which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal, must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. The outcome of the general balancing process would determine whether to authorize a proposal, and if so, the conditions under which it will be allowed to occur. The decision should reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. All factors, which may be relevant to the proposal, must be considered including the cumulative effects thereof. Among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, floodplain values, land use, navigation, shore erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving 404 discharges, a permit will be denied if the discharge that would be authorized by such permit would not comply with the Environmental Protection Agency's 404(b)(l) guidelines. Subject to the preceding sentence and any other applicable guidelines or criteria (see Sections 320.2 and 320.3), a permit will be granted unless the District Commander determines that it would be contrary to the public interest. The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State, and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes; and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects, and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment and/or an Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act. Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity.

AUTHORITY: This permit will be issued or denied under the following authorities: This permit will be issued or denied under the following authorities: (X) Perform work in or affecting navigable waters of the United States – Section 10 Rivers and Harbors Act 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403). (X) Discharge dredged or fill material into waters of the United States – Section 404 Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). Therefore, our public interest review will consider the guidelines set forth under Section 404(b) of the Clean Water Act (40 CFR 230). Project drawings and a Notice of Application for State Water Quality Certification are enclosed with this Public Notice.

District Commander U.S. Army, Corps of Engineers

Enclosures

US Army Corps of Engineers Alaska District

Juneau Field Office Regulatory Division (1145) CEPOA-RD 8800 Glacier Highway, Suite 106 Juneau, Alaska 99801-8079

Public Notice of Application for Permit PUBLIC NOTICE DATE:

January 3, 2012

EXPIRATION DATE:

February 1, 2012

REFERENCE NUMBER:

POA-2011-924

WATERWAY:

Gastineau Channel

Interested parties are hereby notified that a Department of the Army permit application has been received for work in waters of the United States as described below and shown on the enclosed project drawings. Comments on the described work, with the reference number, should reach this office no later than the expiration date of this Public Notice to become part of the record and be considered in the decision. Please contact Randal Vigil at (907) 790-4491 or by email at Randal.P.Vigil@usace.army.mil if further information is desired concerning this notice.

APPLICANT: City and Borough of Juneau, Docks and Harbors Department, 155 South Seward Street, Juneau, Alaska 99801. AGENT:

PND Engineers, Inc., 9360 Glacier Highway, Suite 100, Juneau, Alaska 99801.

LOCATION: The project site is located within Section 23, T. 41 S., R. 67 E., Copper Meridian; USGS Quad Map Juneau B-2; Latitude 58.296º N., Longitude 134.402º W.; Alaska Tidelands Survey 3; at the Smokeries dock, the Alaska Steamship Wharf and the Cruise Ship Terminal, in Juneau, Alaska. PURPOSE: The applicant's stated purpose is to expand the "Smokeries dock, and improve access, security, berthing capacity, and safety at the City and Borough of Juneau's Downtown Cruise Ship Docks." PROPOSED WORK: The applicant requests authorization for the following work in waters and navigable waters of the United States: 1. Discharge approximately 200 cubic yards of fill material into approximately 0.049 acres below the high tide line (approximate elevation +20.8 feet above the 0.0 foot contour) to construction a retaining wall. 2. Construct below the Mean High Water mark (approximate elevation +15.4 feet above the 0.0 foot contour) (MHW) two offshore cruise ship berths. Refer to the below impact tables for details, including the removal of the existing South Ferry Dock, transfer bridge, and associated dolphins and catwalks. All work would be performed in accordance with the enclosed plan (sheets 1-14), dated August 2011. - 1 -

Phase 1 ­ Retaining Wall, Moorage Float, Taku Smokeries ­ Complete May 2013 Table 1 Demolition Plan Structural Element Transfer Bridge South Ferry Dock Dolphins and Catwalks

Size (+/- 10%) 2,600 SF 7,250 SF 6 EA, 300 LF

Number of Piles 12(Steel) 120 (Timber) 22

Pile 12" ­ (8), 24" ­ (4) 12" varies

Table 2 Retaining Wall, Moorage Float and Taku Smokeries Design Elements Structural Element Concrete Retaining Wall (Fill Quantities Below) New South Ferry Dock Replacement and Addition Concrete Moorage Float Gangway Taku Smokeries Work Deck Addition and Mooring Pile

Size (+/- 10%) 75 LF x 1'-3" wide

Number of Piles 9

Pile 24"

11,000 SF

2; 34

16" ; 12.75"

16' x 250' 8' x 120' 1,000 SF

9 8

16" 16"

Number of Piles 36 8 10 27

Pile 16" 16" 48" 48"

Number of Piles 16 8 10 24

Pile 16" 16" 48" 48"

Table 3 Retaining Wall Fill Quantities Material Fill Base Course Rip Rap Excavation Total Area Impacted

Qty Below HTL 200 CY 20 CY 50 CY 0 CY 0.049 AC (2,134.44 SF)

Phase 2 ­ South Berth - Complete May 2014 Table 4 South Berth Design Elements Structural Element Size (+/- 10%) Approach Dock 7,000 SF Vehicle Transfer Bridge 140' x 24' Bridge Support Float 25' x 30' Bridge Landing 50' x 40' Concrete Floating Dock 50' x 400' Mooring and Breasting 6 EA Dolphins and Catwalks Phase 3 ­ North Berth ­ Complete May 2015 Table 5 North Berth Design Elements Structural Element Size (+/- 10%) Approach Dock 4,200 SF Vehicle Transfer Bridge 140' x 24' Bridge Support Float 25' x 30' Bridge Landing 50' x 40' Concrete Floating Dock 50' x 300' Mooring and Breasting 6 EA Dolphins and Catwalks

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The proposed project design is a combination of fixed and floating docks, both of which require steel piles to support or anchor these structures. The floating docks would be manufactured offsite, towed to the site and field installed. The overall in-water work would be significantly shortened by this - 2 -

process. The primary type of pile that would be used at the site would be hollow steel pipe piles. The means of installation would vary with specific locations and would include rock anchors, pin piles, or rock sockets as necessary. The piles would be driven to bedrock or as deep into existing soils as necessary to resist the design loads. Rock anchor and pin pile installation would be similar in that a smaller diameter hole would be drilled into the bedrock underneath the pile, and an anchor rod or small diameter pin pile would be grouted into the hole. Then the annulus between the pile and the anchor rod or pin pile would be also grouted to transfer load between the pile and the anchor rod or pin pile. A rock socket consists of a hole drilled into bedrock. The structural pile would then be driven into the hole to provide a stable base and provide a higher level of uplift and lateral resistance. The means with which piles would be installed would need to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. The applicant supports the use of vibratory pile driving equipment as the primary installation method for the project, impact hammers would only be allowed for piles that encounter soils too dense to penetrate with the vibratory equipment, however, bedrock conditions are anticipated. APPLICANT PROPOSED MITIGATION: The applicant has made the following statements concerning mitigation measures to avoid, minimize, and compensate for impacts to waters of the United States from activities involving discharges of dredged or fill material. a. Avoidance: "This project utilizes pile supported and floating structures to the maximum extent possible. One small concrete retaining wall is required along the upper elevation of an existing slope to replace two existing dilapidated timber walls. Inherently, impacts to the waters of the U.S. will occur by placing fill for the retaining wall. The project includes removing two existing timber retaining walls and replacing them with a concrete retaining wall." b. Minimization: "The design has been optimized to minimize any impacts beyond what is required to construct the retaining wall associated with the CBJ Downtown Cruise Ship Docks project. While the existing fill slope at the site varies from approximately 1:4 to 1:9 (H:V), the project design incorporates the use of a concrete retaining wall with a rip rap slope at the base of the wall designed at 1.5:1 to minimize fill quantities as much as practicable while still meeting the intended purpose and need." c. Compensatory Mitigation: "Placement of fill and impacts to waters of the U.S. are minor, approximately 0.049 acres below the HTL. The purpose of the fill is to prevent erosion and provide slope stability, no additional mitigation measures are being proposed." WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION: A permit for the described work will not be issued until a certification or waiver of certification, as required under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (Public Law 95-217), has been received from the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation. CULTURAL RESOURCES: The latest published version of the Alaska Heritage Resources Survey (AHRS) has been consulted for the presence or absence of historic properties, including those listed in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. There is an unevaluated property in the vicinity of the worksite. It has been designated JUN-314. There are also registered or eligible properties in the vicinity of the worksite. They have been designated JUN-00376, JUN-00118, JUN-00374, JUN-00212, and JUN-00373. Because these properties have been determined to be outside of the project area, we have determined that there would be no effect to historic properties. Consultation of the AHRS constitutes the extent of cultural resource investigations by the District Commander at this time. This application is being coordinated with SHPO. Any comments SHPO may have concerning presently unknown archeological or historic data that may be lost or destroyed by work under the requested permit will be considered in our final assessment of the described work. - 3 -

ENDANGERED SPECIES: The project area is within the known or historic range of the Humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) and Steller sea lion (Eumetopias jubatus). Preliminarily, we have determined the described activity would have no effect on any listed or proposed threatened or endangered species, and would have no effect on any designated or proposed critical habitat, under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (87 Stat. 844). This application is being coordinated with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). Any comments they may have concerning endangered or threatened wildlife or plants or their critical habitat will be considered in our final assessment of the described work. ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT: The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, as amended by the Sustainable Fisheries Act of 1996, requires all Federal agencies to consult with the NMFS on all actions, or proposed actions, permitted, funded, or undertaken by the agency, that may adversely affect Essential Fish Habitat (EFH). The project area is within the known range of the Chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), chum (Oncorhynchus keta), Coho (Oncorhynchus kisutch), pink (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha), and sockeye (Oncorhynchus nerka) salmon, and the following species of groundfish: Arrowtooth flounder (Atheresthes stomias), flathead sole (Hippoglossoides elassodon), rex sole (Glyptocephalus zachirus), rock sole (Lepidopsetta polyxystra and L. bilineata), Dover sole (Microstomus pacificus), dusky rockfish (Sebastes ciliates), Pacific cod (Gadus macrocephalus), Pacific ocean perch (Sebastes alutus), shortraker rockfish (Sebastes borealis), rougheye rockfish (Sebastes aleutianus), sablefish (Anoplopoma fimbria), skates (Raja binoculata and R. rhina), walleye Pollock (Theragra chalcogramma), yelloweye rockfish (Sebastes ruberrimus), and sculpins (Cottidae spp.). Preliminarily, we have determined the described activity may adversely affect EFH in the project area for the following species: Chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), chum (Oncorhynchus keta), Coho (Oncorhynchus kisutch), pink (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha), and sockeye (Oncorhynchus nerka) salmon. The proposed project location is nearshore shallow water habitat primarily for adult and juvenile salmon migration, as these waters provide refuge from predators and opportunity to rest. The proposed project would extend a portion of the shoreline into deeper water and involve pile driving, which may increase salmon mortality, particularly juveniles, through predation. This Public Notice initiates EFH consultation with the NMFS. Any comments or recommendations they may have concerning EFH will be considered in our final assessment of the described work. TRIBAL CONSULTATION: The Alaska District fully supports tribal self-governance and government-to-government relations between Federally recognized Tribes and the Federal government. Tribes with protected rights or resources that could be significantly affected by a proposed Federal action (e.g., a permit decision) have the right to consult with the Alaska District on a government-to-government basis. Views of each Tribe regarding protected rights and resources will be accorded due consideration in this process. This Public Notice serves as notification to the Tribes within the area potentially affected by the proposed work and invites their participation in the Federal decision-making process regarding the protected Tribal right or resource. Consultation may be initiated by the affected Tribe upon written request to the District Commander during the public comment period. PUBLIC HEARING: Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in this notice, that a public hearing be held to consider this application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with particularity, reasons for holding a public hearing. EVALUATION: The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts, including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity and - 4 -

its intended use on the public interest. Evaluation of the probable impacts, which the proposed activity may have on the public interest, requires a careful weighing of all the factors that become relevant in each particular case. The benefits, which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal, must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. The outcome of the general balancing process would determine whether to authorize a proposal, and if so, the conditions under which it will be allowed to occur. The decision should reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. All factors, which may be relevant to the proposal, must be considered including the cumulative effects thereof. Among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, floodplain values, land use, navigation, shore erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving 404 discharges, a permit will be denied if the discharge that would be authorized by such permit would not comply with the Environmental Protection Agency's 404(b)(l) guidelines. Subject to the preceding sentence and any other applicable guidelines or criteria (see Sections 320.2 and 320.3), a permit will be granted unless the District Commander determines that it would be contrary to the public interest. The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State, and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes; and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects, and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment and/or an Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act. Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity. AUTHORITY:

This permit will be issued or denied under the following authorities:

(X) Perform work in or affecting navigable waters of the United States ­ Section 10 Rivers and Harbors Act 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403). (X) Discharge dredged or fill material into waters of the United States ­ Section 404 Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). Therefore, our public interest review will consider the guidelines set forth under Section 404(b) of the Clean Water Act (40 CFR 230). Project drawings and a Notice of Application for State Water Quality Certification are enclosed with this Public Notice.

District Commander U.S. Army, Corps of Engineers Enclosures

- 5 -

SEAN PARNELL, GOVERNOR

STATE OF ALASKA DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION DIVISION OF WATER 401 Certification Program Non-Point Source Water Pollution Control Program

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION WQM/401 CERTIFICATION 410 WILLOUGHBY AVENUE JUNEAU, ALASKA 99801-1795 PHONE: (907) 465-5321/FAX: (907) 465-5274

NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR STATE WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION

Any applicant for a federal license or permit to conduct an activity that might result in a discharge into navigable waters, in accordance with Section 401 of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (PL95-217), also must apply for and obtain certification from the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation that the discharge will comply with the Clean Water Act, the Alaska Water Quality Standards, and other applicable State laws. By agreement between the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Department of Environmental Conservation, application for a Department of the Army permit to discharge dredged or fill material into navigable waters under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act also may serve as application for State Water Quality Certification. Notice is hereby given that the application for a Department of the Army Permit described in the Corps of Engineers' Public Notice No. POA-2011-294, Gastineau Channel, serves as application for State Water Quality Certification from the Department of Environmental Conservation. After reviewing the application, the Department may certify there is reasonable assurance the activity, and any discharge that might result, will comply with the Clean Water Act, the Alaska Water Quality Standards, and other applicable State laws. The Department also may deny or waive certification. Any person desiring to comment on the project, with respect to Water Quality Certification, may submit written comments to the address above by the expiration date of the Corps of Engineer's Public Notice.

SKAGWAY HAINES

DOWNTOWN JUNEAU

JUNEAU / DOUGLAS BRIDGE

SITKA

PETERSBURG

AS

G

KAKE

N

TI

WRANGELL

U

EA

CRAIG

CBJ DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCK

KETCHIKAN

EL

N

AN

H

C

JUNEAU ROCK DUMP

SCALE IN MILES DOUGLAS 0

PURPOSE: TO IMPROVE ACCESS, SECURITY, BERTHING CAPACITY AND SAFETY AT THE CBJ DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS.

1

1 2

CBJ DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS RECONFIGURATION

VICINITY MAP LOCATION MAP IN: APPLICANT ADDRESS:

DATUM: MLLW = 0.0 FT

HTL = 20.8' MHW = 15.4' MLLW = 0.0'

CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU DOCKS & HARBOR DEPT. 155 S. SEWARD STREET JUNEAU, AK 99801 PND#: 102050.01

GASTINEAU CHANNEL

NEAR: JUNEAU DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS AT: APPLICATION BY: CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU DATE:

AUGUST 2011

SHEET 1

OF 14

MERCHANTS WHARF EGA

N DR

. MA RIN

HTL = 20.8 MHW = 15.4 MLLW = 0

EW AY

MARINE PARK

SEAPLANE FLOAT

CBJ PARKING GARAGE

AL

LIGHTERING FLOAT

AS KA ST EA M SH

IP DO CK

ATS 3 BOUNDARY

SO

'

00

UT

10

H

TRAM PLAZA

FR AN KL

SEWER FORCE MAIN

IN ST

CR UI

CBJ DOCKS

CRUISE SHIP TERMINAL STAGING AREA

SE SH

FISHERMEN'S MEMORIAL

IP TE RM

TAKU SMOKERIES/ FISHERIES

IN AL

PORT CUSTOMS BLDG

MINERS COVE SEAWALK

'

00

10

TAKU FISHERIES DOCK

AS

G EA

N

TI

INTERMEDIATE VESSEL FLOAT

U

MINERS COVE

EL

N

AN

H

C

PURPOSE:

SOUTH FRANKLIN DOCK

SCALE IN FEET 0

500

APPLICANT ADDRESS:

DATUM: MLLW = 0.0 FT

HTL = 20.8' MHW = 15.4' MLLW = 0.0'

CBJ DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS RECONFIGURATION

EXISTING CONDITIONS SITE PLAN

TO IMPROVE ACCESS, SECURITY, BERTHING CAPACITY AND SAFETY AT THE CBJ DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS.

CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU DOCKS & HARBOR DEPT. 155 S. SEWARD STREET JUNEAU, AK 99801 PND#: 102050.01

1000

IN:

GASTINEAU CHANNEL

NEAR: JUNEAU DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS AT: APPLICATION BY: CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU DATE:

AUGUST 2011

SHEET 2

OF 14

HTL = 20.8 MHW = 15.4 MLLW = 0

-10

-40

-20

-30

-50 -40

-50 -40

-50

HTL = 20.8 MHW = 15.4 MLLW = 0

-60

-70

-80

-90

-90 FM

-50 -20

-60

00

10 '

PROPOSED NORTH BERTH BOUNDARY, SEE SHEET 4

PROPOSED RETAINING WALL, MOORAGE FLOAT AND TAKU SMOKERIES IMPROVEMENTS, SEE SHEETS 6 & 7. -90

0

-40

-5

-80

-70

0

-6

FM

HTL = 20.8 MHW = 15.4 MLLW = 0 -70 0

-3

0

-4

0

-5

0

-6

PROPOSED SOUTH BERTH BOUNDARY, SEE SHEET 5

-20

-100

-30

00

10 '

-70 -80

-70

-100

-90 -80

-90

-100

-100

-1 00

G -100

AS

-100 FM

U

EA

N

TI H

C 00

-20

N

AN

-1

-100

EL

-100

-30

FM

-40

0

-8

-90 -40

-80

-30

-8

-30

0

-30

-4

0

-70

-50 0

-6

-70

0

-7

PURPOSE:

SCALE IN FEET 0

500

APPLICANT ADDRESS:

DATUM: MLLW = 0.0 FT

HTL = 20.8' MHW = 15.4' MLLW = 0.0'

CBJ DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS RECONFIGURATION

PROPOSED SITE PLAN

TO IMPROVE ACCESS, SECURITY, BERTHING CAPACITY AND SAFETY AT THE CBJ DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS.

CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU DOCKS & HARBOR DEPT. 155 S. SEWARD STREET JUNEAU, AK 99801 PND#: 102050.01

1000

IN:

GASTINEAU CHANNEL

NEAR: JUNEAU DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS AT: APPLICATION BY: CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU DATE:

AUGUST 2011

SHEET 3

OF 14

EGAN

HTL = 20.8 MHW = 15.4 MLLW = 0

DR.

MERCHANTS WHARF NEW APPROACH DOCK w/ SECURITY GATE

MA

MARINE PARK

RIN EW AY

EXISTING SEAPLANE FLOAT

EXISTING CBJ DOCK

NEW BRIDGE SUPPORT FLOAT

CBJ PARKING GARGAGE

B

H

UT

SO

C

FR AN

HTL = 20.8 MHW = 15.4 MLLW = 0

B

KL IN ST

C

D

NEW VEHICLE TRANSFER BRIDGE NEW BRIDGE LANDING

D

'

00

10

STRUCTURE SUMMARY (NORTH BERTH) STRUCTURE

SIZE

# OF PILES

PILE Ø

APPROACH DOCK

4,200 SF

16

16"

VEHICLE TRANSFER BRIDGE

140' X 24'

8

16'

BRIDGE SUPPORT FLOAT

25' X 30'

-

-

BRIDGE LANDING

50' X 40'

-

-

CONCRETE FLOATING DOCK

50' X 300'

10

48"

MOORING & BREASTING DOLPHINS

6 EA

24

48"

PURPOSE:

NEW CONCRETE FLOATING DOCK

E NEW MOORING & BREASTING DOLPHINS, SEE SHEET 10

H TC MA INE L

200

APPLICANT ADDRESS:

MLLW = 0.0 FT

CBJ DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS RECONFIGURATION

SCALE IN FEET 0

DATUM:

4 T EE T 5 H S EE SH

NORTH BERTH PROPOSED SITE PLAN

TO IMPROVE ACCESS, SECURITY, BERTHING CAPACITY AND SAFETY AT THE CBJ DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS.

HTL = 20.8' MHW = 15.4' MLLW = 0.0'

E

CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU DOCKS & HARBOR DEPT. 155 S. SEWARD STREET JUNEAU, AK 99801 PND#: 102050.01

400

IN:

GASTINEAU CHANNEL

NEAR: JUNEAU DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS AT: APPLICATION BY: CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU DATE:

AUGUST 2011

SHEET 4

OF 14

HTL = 20.8 MHW = 15.4 MLLW = 0 EXISTING CBJ DOCK

4 T EE T 5 H S EE SH

SO

UT

H

NEW APPROACH DOCK W/ SECURITY GATE

H TC MA INE L

FR

AN

KL

IN

ST SEE SHEETS 6&7

CRUISE SHIP TERMINAL STAGING AREA

NEW VEHICLE TRANSFER BRIDGE

TAKU SMOKERIES/ FISHERIES BLDG

NEW BRIDGE SUPPORT FLOAT NEW BRIDGE LANDING NEW CONCRETE FLOATING DOCK

MINERS COVE SEAWALK

00

10 '

INTERMEDIATE VESSEL FLOAT

STRUCTURE SUMMARY (SOUTH BERTH) STRUCTURE

SIZE

# OF PILES

PILE Ø

APPROACH DOCK

7,000 SF

36

16"

VEHICLE TRANSFER BRIDGE

140' X 24'

8

16"

BRIDGE SUPPORT FLOAT

25' X 30'

-

-

BRIDGE LANDING

50' X 40'

-

-

CONCRETE FLOATING DOCK

50' X 400'

10

48"

MOORING AND BREASTING DOLPHINS

6 EA

27

48"

PURPOSE:

NEW MOORING & BREASTING DOLPHINS, SEE SHEET 9

SCALE IN FEET 0

200

APPLICANT ADDRESS:

DATUM: MLLW = 0.0 FT

HTL = 20.8' MHW = 15.4' MLLW = 0.0'

CBJ DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS RECONFIGURATION

SOUTH BERTH PROPOSED SITE PLAN

TO IMPROVE ACCESS, SECURITY, BERTHING CAPACITY AND SAFETY AT THE CBJ DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS.

CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU DOCKS & HARBOR DEPT. 155 S. SEWARD STREET JUNEAU, AK 99801 PND#: 102050.01

400

IN:

GASTINEAU CHANNEL

NEAR: JUNEAU DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS AT: APPLICATION BY: CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU DATE:

AUGUST 2011

SHEET 5

OF 14

HTL = 20.8 MHW = 15.4 MLLW = 0 REMOVE TRANSFER BRIDGE

EXISTING CBJ DOCK

SO TRAM PLAZA BLDG TO REMAIN

CRUISE SHIP TERMINAL STAGING AREA

UT

H

FR

AN

KL

IN

ST

DEMO PORTION OF SOUTH FERRY DOCK

EXISTING DOCK TO REMAIN

PORT CUSTOMS BLDG TO REMAIN

FISHERMEN'S MEMORIAL TAKU SMOKERIES/ FISHERIES BLDG

REMOVE DOLPHINS & CATWALKS, TYP.

HTL = 20.8 MHW = 15.4 MLLW = 0

DEMOLITION SUMMARY

SIZE

NO. OF PILES

PILE Ø

TRANSFER BRIDGE

2,600 SF

12 (STEEL)

12" (8) 24" (4)

SOUTH FERRY DOCK

7,250 SF

120 (TIMBER)

DOLPHINS & ASSOC. CATWALKS

6 EA @ 300LF

22

10

STRUCTURE

TAKU FISHERIES DOCK TO REMAIN

MINERS COVE SEAWALK

EXISTING INTERMEDIATE VESSEL FLOAT

12"

00

VARIES

'

PURPOSE: TO IMPROVE ACCESS, SECURITY, BERTHING CAPACITY AND SAFETY AT THE CBJ DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS.

SCALE IN FEET 0

100

APPLICANT ADDRESS:

DATUM: MLLW = 0.0 FT

HTL = 20.8' MHW = 15.4' MLLW = 0.0'

CBJ DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS RECONFIGURATION

TRANSFER BRIDGE PROPOSED DEMOLITION PLAN

CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU DOCKS & HARBOR DEPT. 155 S. SEWARD STREET JUNEAU, AK 99801 PND#: 102050.01

200

IN:

GASTINEAU CHANNEL

NEAR: JUNEAU DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS AT: APPLICATION BY: CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU DATE:

AUGUST 2011

SHEET 6

OF 14

HTL = 20.8 MHW = 15.4 H

MLLW = 0

NEW CONCRETE RETAINING WALL AND FILL

G

EXISTING CBJ DOCK

SOUTH FERRY DOCK

G

SO

TRAM PLAZA BLDG

CRUISE SHIP TERMINAL STAGING AREA

UT

H

FR

AN

KL

IN

ST

H

NEW DOCK ADDITION, APPROX. 11,000 SF

NEW GANGWAY A

NEW CONCRETE MOORAGE FLOAT A

PORT CUSTOMS BLDG

FISHERMEN'S MEMORIAL

STRUCTURE SUMMARY (RETAINING WALL AND TAKU SMOKERIES DOCK)

TAKU SMOKERIES/ FISHERIES BLDG

SIZE

# OF PILES

PILE Ø

CONCRETE RETAINING WALL AND FILL

75 LF X 1'-3" WIDE

9

24"

NEW DOCK ADDITION

11,000 SF

2, 34

16", 12.75"

CONCRETE MOORAGE FLOAT

16' X 250'

9

16"

GANGWAY

8' X 120'

-

-

8

16"

NEW WORK DECK ADDITION

1,000 SF

F

NEW WORK DECK ADDITION & MOORING PILE

MINERS COVE SEAWALK

SUMMARY OF FILL QUANTITIES TOTAL PROJECT QTY

QTY BELOW HTL

QTY SEAWARD MHW

FILL

700 CY

200 CY

400 CY

BASE COURSE

20 CY

20 CY

20 CY

RIP RAP

50 CY

50 CY

50 CY

EXCAVATION

100 CY

0 CY

0 CY

EXISTING INTERMEDIATE VESSEL FLOAT

'

00

10

MATERIAL

PURPOSE:

SCALE IN FEET 0

100

APPLICANT ADDRESS:

DATUM: MLLW = 0.0 FT

HTL = 20.8' MHW = 15.4' MLLW = 0.0'

CBJ DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS RECONFIGURATION

TRANSFER BRIDGE PROPOSED SITE PLAN

TO IMPROVE ACCESS, SECURITY, BERTHING CAPACITY AND SAFETY AT THE CBJ DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS.

HTL = 20.8 MHW = 15.4 MLLW = 0

TAKU FISHERIES DOCK

F

STRUCTURE

CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU DOCKS & HARBOR DEPT. 155 S. SEWARD STREET JUNEAU, AK 99801 PND#: 102050.01

200

IN:

GASTINEAU CHANNEL

NEAR: JUNEAU DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS AT: APPLICATION BY: CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU DATE:

AUGUST 2011

SHEET 7

OF 14

TOP OF PILE ELEV. +30' ±

GANGWAY

EXISTING DOCK TO REMAIN

TOP OF DOCK ELEV. +25' ±

HTL ELEV. +20.8 MHW ELEV. +15.4' 16' x 250' CONCRETE FLOAT

MLLW ELEV. +0.0' 16'

APPROX. GROUND LINE APPROX. BEDROCK

SECTION A-A

PURPOSE:

CBJ DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS RECONFIGURATION

SECTIONS

TO IMPROVE ACCESS, SECURITY, BERTHING CAPACITY AND SAFETY AT THE CBJ DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS.

IN: APPLICANT ADDRESS:

DATUM: MLLW = 0.0 FT

HTL = 20.8' MHW = 15.4' MLLW = 0.0'

CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU DOCKS & HARBOR DEPT. 155 S. SEWARD STREET JUNEAU, AK 99801 PND#: 102050.01

GASTINEAU CHANNEL

NEAR: JUNEAU DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS AT: APPLICATION BY: CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU DATE:

AUGUST 2011

SHEET 8

OF 14

VARIES

EXISTING DOCK TO REMAIN

0' TO 100'± BULLRAIL

TIMBER DECK

TOP OF DECK ELEV. +25' ±

TOP OF PIER ELEV. +25'±

HTL ELEV. +20.8'

STEEL PILE CAP

MHW ELEV. +15.4' MLLW ELEV. +0.0'

STEEL PIPE PILE, TYP.

APPROX. GROUNDLINE

APPROX. BEDROCK

SECTION B-B NEW PIER 14 0'

MHW ELEV. +15.4'

HTL ELEV. +20.8'

TRANSFER BRIDGE MLLW ELEV. +0.0'

FLOATING DOCK

SECTION C-C

PURPOSE:

CBJ DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS RECONFIGURATION

SECTIONS

TO IMPROVE ACCESS, SECURITY, BERTHING CAPACITY AND SAFETY AT THE CBJ DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS.

IN: APPLICANT ADDRESS:

DATUM: MLLW = 0.0 FT

HTL = 20.8' MHW = 15.4' MLLW = 0.0'

CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU DOCKS & HARBOR DEPT. 155 S. SEWARD STREET JUNEAU, AK 99801 PND#: 102050.01

GASTINEAU CHANNEL

NEAR: JUNEAU DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS AT: APPLICATION BY: CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU DATE:

AUGUST 2011

SHEET

9 OF 14

50'

PEDESTRIAN GUARDRAIL

40'-0"

REMOVABLE COMBINATION VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN BARRIER

24'-0" STEEL VEHICLE TRANSFER BRIDGE

FLOATING CONCRETE DOCK

FOAM FILLED MARINE FENDER

FLOATING CONCRETE BRIDGE LANDING

8'-0" FREEBOARD

SECTION D-D

CATWALK

QUICK RELEASE MOORING HOOK NOT SHOWN DOLPHIN CAP TOP OF DECK ELEV. +30'±

TOP OF PILE ELEV. +24'±

MHHW ELEV. +15.4' MLLW ELEV. +0.0' FOAM FILLED MARINE FENDER DROP ON FENDER FRAME

STEEL PIPE PILE, TYP.

STEEL PIPE FENDER PILE, TYP.

APPROX. GROUNDLINE APPROX. BEDROCK

SECTION E-E PURPOSE:

CBJ DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS RECONFIGURATION

SECTIONS

TO IMPROVE ACCESS, SECURITY, BERTHING CAPACITY AND SAFETY AT THE CBJ DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS.

IN: APPLICANT ADDRESS:

DATUM: MLLW = 0.0 FT

HTL = 20.8' MHW = 15.4' MLLW = 0.0'

CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU DOCKS & HARBOR DEPT. 155 S. SEWARD STREET JUNEAU, AK 99801 PND#: 102050.01

GASTINEAU CHANNEL

NEAR: JUNEAU DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS AT: APPLICATION BY: CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU DATE:

AUGUST 2011

SHEET 10 OF 14

TIMBER DECK BULLRAIL

VARIES 0' TO 100'±

EXISTING DOCK TO REMAIN

TOP OF DECK ELEV. +25' ±

TOP OF DOCK ELEV. +25'±

HTL ELEV. +20.8'

STEEL PILE CAP

MHW ELEV. +15.4'

STEEL PIPE PILE, TYP.

MLLW ELEV. +0.0'

STEEL PIPE FENDER, TYP.

APPROX. GROUNDLINE APPROX. BEDROCK

SECTION F-F

PURPOSE:

CBJ DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS RECONFIGURATION

SECTIONS

TO IMPROVE ACCESS, SECURITY, BERTHING CAPACITY AND SAFETY AT THE CBJ DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS.

IN: APPLICANT ADDRESS:

DATUM: MLLW = 0.0 FT

HTL = 20.8' MHW = 15.4' MLLW = 0.0'

CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU DOCKS & HARBOR DEPT. 155 S. SEWARD STREET JUNEAU, AK 99801 PND#: 102050.01

GASTINEAU CHANNEL

NEAR: JUNEAU DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS AT: APPLICATION BY: CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU DATE:

AUGUST 2011

SHEET 11 OF 14

MLLW ELEV. +0.0'

MHW ELEV. +15.4'

HTL ELEV. +20.8'

TO IMPROVE ACCESS, SECURITY, BERTHING CAPACITY AND SAFETY AT THE CBJ DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS.

STEEL BATTER PILE, TYP

CBJ DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS RECONFIGURATION

PORT CUSTOMS DOCK SECTION IN: APPLICANT ADDRESS:

DATUM: MLLW = 0.0 FT

HTL = 20.8' MHW = 15.4' MLLW = 0.0'

CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU DOCKS & HARBOR DEPT. 155 S. SEWARD STREET JUNEAU, AK 99801 PND#: 102050.01

EXISTING GROUND

EXISTING WALL

CONCRETE DECK

STEEL VERTICAL PILE, TYP

SECTION H-H

STEEL PILE CAP

TOP OF DECK ELEV. +25' ± TIMBER GLU-LAM STRINGER

TIMBER DECK

PURPOSE:

GASTINEAU CHANNEL

NEAR: JUNEAU DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS AT: APPLICATION BY: CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU DATE:

AUGUST 2011

SHEET 13 OF 14

STEEL PIPE PILE, TYP.

GROUNDLINE

PILE TIP AS REQ'D BEDROCK

DRIVEN PILE DRILLED AND GROUTED PIPE PIN PILE

DRILLED SOCKET SIMILAR IN SIZE TO PILE DRILLED AND GROUTED ROD

PIN PILE

PILE SOCKET NOTE: STEEL PIPE PILE TIPS FOR THIS PROJECT WILL BE INSTALLED PER ONE OF THE METHODS DEPICTED ON THIS SHEET. ACTUAL METHOD TO BE DETERMINED AS SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS BECOME KNOWN. ALL PILES DRIVEN TO IMPACT HAMMER REFUSAL

PURPOSE:

ROCK ANCHOR

CBJ DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS RECONFIGURATION

PILE DETAILS

TO IMPROVE ACCESS, SECURITY, BERTHING CAPACITY AND SAFETY AT THE CBJ DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS.

IN: APPLICANT ADDRESS:

DATUM: MLLW = 0.0 FT

HTL = 20.8' MHW = 15.4' MLLW = 0.0'

CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU DOCKS & HARBOR DEPT. 155 S. SEWARD STREET JUNEAU, AK 99801 PND#: 102050.01

GASTINEAU CHANNEL

NEAR: JUNEAU DOWNTOWN CRUISE SHIP DOCKS AT: APPLICATION BY: CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU DATE:

AUGUST 2011

SHEET 14 OF 14

Rough impact

We use the fields in this section to decide whether to conduct an in-depth review.

Permit Manager

Dates

Identity numbers

Permits, certifications, and locations related to this particular notice

History of edits

Data are available as CSV download in the following schemas