You can copy from here when filling out the rest of the page.
PUBLIC NOTICE DATE: May 24, 2012EXPIRATION DATE: June 18, 2012REFERENCE NUMBER:
PUBLIC NOTICE DATE: May 24, 2012
EXPIRATION DATE: June 18, 2012
REFERENCE NUMBER: POA-1976-83-M5
WATERWAY: Iliuliuk Bay
Interested parties are hereby notified that a Department of the Army permit application has been received for work in waters of the United States as described below and shown on the enclosed project drawings.
Comments on the described work, with the reference number, should reach this office no later than the expiration date of this Public Notice to become part of the record and be considered in the decision. Please contact Jack Hewitt at telephone (907) 753-2708, toll free from within Alaska at (800) 478-2712, by fax at
(907) 753-5567, or by email at Jack.J.Hewitt@usace.army.mil if further information is desired concerning this notice.
APPLICANT: Coastal Transportation, Inc., 4025 13th Avenue West, Seattle, Washington 98119.
AGENT: Ecco Design, Inc., 203 North 36th Street, Suite 201, Seattle, Washington 98103.
LOCATION: The project site is located within Section 3, T. 73 S., R. 118 W., Seward Meridian, USGS Quad Map: Unalaska C-2, Latitude 53.8803º N., Longitude 166.5394º W., in Unalaska, Alaska.
SPECIAL AREA DESIGNATION: The project is located within the Aleutian World War II National Historic Area.
PURPOSE: The applicant’s stated purpose is to extend the dock to accommodate various sized vessels that can dock and offload product for distribution to customers.
PROPOSED WORK: Construct new 50’ by 57’, and 10’ by 181’ pile supported pier extensions to the north end of existing pier. Construct new 66’ by 82’ pile supported pier extension to the south end of existing pier. The proposed pier extensions would be used for docking large break-bulk cargo ships for consolidation and redistribution to customers. All work would be performed in accordance with the enclosed plans, 13 sheets, dated April 5, 2012.
APPLICANT PROPOSED MITIGATION: The applicant proposes the following mitigation measures to avoid, minimize, and compensate for impacts to waters of the United States from activities involving discharges of dredged or fill material.
a. Avoidance: All work shall take place within the allowable in-water work timing window. Appropriate best management practices (BMMPs) shall be employed to prevent deleterious material from entering the aquatic environment during construction. A boom shall be deployed before commencement of construction to contain any floating debris that may result from the pile repair work. The boom shall remain in place during the pile repair work. If floating debris enters the water during the proposed work, the debris shall be removed immediately from the water, be stored on site, and be disposed of at an appropriate upland facility. If heaving (sinking) debris enters the water during the proposed work, the location of this debris shall be documented in a log that is kept on site for the duration of the project. When the proposed work is completed, all sunken debris that has entered the water during construction shall be retrieved and be disposed of in an appropriate upland facility. Appropriate BMPs shall be employed to minimize the amount of erosion at the shoreline caused by construction material storage and staging, and the proposed construction work. If toxic materials, such as a petroleum based product, enter the water, this material shall be reported and immediately contained using the appropriate equipment and material. Appropriate equipment and material for hazardous material clean up shall be kept at the site during construction. Any depressions in the substrate created by the removal of the piling shall be filled with clean native substrate that is of the same size and type of the existing substrate. All treated wood used for the project shall meet or exceed the standards established in “BMPs of the Use of Treated Wood in Aquatic Environments” developed by the Western Wood Preservers Institute.
b. Minimization: No creosote wood would be used in the project. All wood materials would meet or exceed the standards established in “BMPs for the Use of Treated Wood in Aquatic Environments”. The new decking material shall be untreated wood. The pier heights will be built as high above the high water line as possible to allow for light mitigation below the pier. No fill discharges will take place as part of this project. The project includes pier work only. No shoreline, bulkhead, dredging or fill would take place as part of the project.
c. Compensatory Mitigation: Compensatory mitigation is not practicable for this project. The commercial pier serves as a hub for commerce to the region. The overall size of the additions would be kept to a minimum but would still allow for vessels to dock and load/unload safely. The overall scope of the work is being completed as an improvement for economic development of the general region.
CULTURAL RESOURCES: The latest published version of the Alaska Heritage Resources Survey (AHRS) has been consulted for the presence or absence of historic properties, including those listed in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. There are no listed or eligible properties in the vicinity of the worksite. However, the project area has been determined to be within the Dutch Harbor Naval Operating Base and Fort Mears National Historic Landmark, a determination of effect will be made in consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) with the National Park Service. Any comments the SHPO or NPS may have concerning presently unknown archeological or historic data that may be lost or destroyed by work under the requested permit will be considered in our final assessment of the described work.
ENDANGERED SPECIES: The project site is within the known or historic range of the northern sea otter (Enhydra lutris), Steller’s eider (Polysticta stelleri), and the Steller sea-lion (Eumetopias jubatus). The project is also within the area designated as critical habitat for northern sea otter. We have determined the described activity will not affect the species listed above, or designated critical habitat, under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (87 Stat. 844).
ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT: The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, as amended by the Sustainable Fisheries Act of 1996, requires all Federal agencies to consult with the NMFS on all actions, or proposed actions, permitted, funded, or undertaken by the agency, that may adversely affect Essential Fish Habitat (EFH). The project area is within the known range of pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha), chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta), coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch), sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka), chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and weathervane scallops (Patinopecten caurinus). We are currently gathering information regarding these species and have yet to make a determination of effect. Should we find that the described activity may affect the species listed above, we will follow the appropriate course of action under Section 305(b)(2) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act. Any comments the National Marine Fisheries Service may have concerning essential fish habitat will be considered in our final assessment of the described work.
TRIBAL CONSULTATION: The Alaska District fully supports tribal self-governance and government-to-government relations between Federally recognized Tribes and the Federal government. Tribes with protected rights or resources that could be significantly affected by a proposed Federal action (e.g., a permit decision) have the right to consult with the Alaska District on a government-to-government basis. Views of each Tribe regarding protected rights and resources will be accorded due consideration in this process. This Public Notice serves as notification to the Tribes within the area potentially affected by the proposed work and invites their participation in the Federal decision-making process regarding the protected Tribal right or resource. Consultation may be initiated by the affected Tribe upon written request to the District Commander during the public comment period.
PUBLIC HEARING: Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in this notice, that a public hearing be held to consider this application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with particularity, reasons for holding a public hearing.
EVALUATION: The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts, including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity and its intended use on the public interest. Evaluation of the probable impacts, which the proposed activity may have on the public interest, requires a careful weighing of all the factors that become relevant in each particular case. The benefits, which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal, must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. The outcome of the general balancing process would determine whether to authorize a proposal, and if so, the conditions under which it will be allowed to occur. The decision should reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. All factors, which may be relevant to the proposal, must be considered including the cumulative effects thereof. Among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, floodplain values, land use, navigation, shore erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving 404 discharges, a permit will be denied if the discharge that would be authorized by such permit would not comply with the Environmental Protection Agency's 404(b)(l) guidelines. Subject to the preceding sentence and any other applicable guidelines or criteria (see Sections 320.2 and 320.3), a permit will be granted unless the District Commander determines that it would be contrary to the public interest.
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State, and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes; and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects, and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment and/or an Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act. Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity.
AUTHORITY: This permit will be issued or denied under the following authority:
(X) Perform work in or affecting navigable waters of the United States – Section 10 Rivers and Harbors Act 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403).
Project drawings are enclosed with this Public Notice.
District Commander
U.S. Army, Corps of Engineers
Enclosures
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Alaska District
Regulatory Division (1145)
CEPOA-RD
Post Office Box 6898
JBER, Alaska 99506-0898
Public Notice
of Application
for Permit
PVBLIC NOTICE DATE:
May 24, 2012
EXPIRATION DATE:
June 18, 2012
REFERENCE NUMBER:
POA-1976-83-M5
WATERWAY:
Iliuliuk Bay
Interested parties are hereby notified that a Department of the Army permit
application has been received for work in waters of the United States as described
below and shown on the enclosed project drawings.
Comments on the described work, with the reference number, should reach this office
no later than the expiration date of this Public Notice to become part of the
record and be considered in the decision.
Please contact Jack Hewitt at telephone
(907) 753-2708, toll free from within Alaska at (800) 478-2712, by fax at
(907) 753-5567, or by email atJack.J.Hewitt@usace.army.milif further information
is desired concerning this notice.
APPLICANT:
Washington
AGENT:
98103.
Coastal Transportation, Inc., 4025 13th Avenue West, Seattle,
98119.
Ecco Design, Inc., 203 North 36 th Street, Suite 201, Seattle, Washington
LOCATION:
The project site is located within Section 3, T. 73 S., R. 118 W.,
Seward Meridian, USGS Quad Map: Unalaska C-2, Latitude 53.8803° N., Longitude
166.5394° W., in Unalaska, Alaska.
SPECIAL AREA DESIGNATION:
National Historic Area.
The project is located within the Aleutian World War II
PURPOSE: The applicant's stated purpose is to extend the dock to accommodate
various sized vessels that can dock and offload product for distribution to
customers.
PROPOSED WORK: Construct new 50' by 57', and 10' by 181' pile supported pier
extensions to the north end of existing pier. Construct new 66' by 82' pile
supported pier extension to the south end of existing pier.
The proposed pier
extensions would be used for docking large break-bulk cargo ships for consolidation
and redistribution to customers. All work would be performed in accordance with
the enclosed plans, 13 sheets, dated April 5, 2012.
APPLICANT PROPOSED MITIGATION:
The applicant proposes the following mitigation
measures to avoid, minimize, and compensate for impacts to waters of the United
States from activities involving discharges of dredged or fill material.
a. Avoidance: All work shall take place within the allowable in-water work
timing window. Appropriate best management practices (BMMPs) shall be employed to
prevent deleterious material from entering the aquatic environment during
construction. A boom shall be deployed before commencement of construction to
contain any floating debris that may result from the pile repair work.
The boom
shall remain in place during the pile repair work.
If floating debris enters the
water during the proposed work, the debris shall be removed immediately from the
water, be stored on site, and be disposed of at an appropriate upland facility.
If
heaving (sinking) debris enters the water during the proposed work, the location of
this debris shall be documented in a log that is kept on site for the duration of
the project. When the proposed work is completed, all sunken debris that has
entered the water during construction shall be retrieved and be disposed of in an
appropriate upland facility.
Appropriate BMPs shall be employed to minimize the
amount of erosion at the shoreline caused by construction material storage and
staging, and the proposed construction work.
If toxic materials, such as a
petroleum based product, enter the water, this material shall be reported and
immediately contained using the appropriate equipment and material. Appropriate
equipment and material for hazardous material clean up shall be kept at the site
during construction. Any depressions in the substrate created by the removal of
the piling shall be filled with clean native substrate that is of the same size and
type of the existing substrate. All treated wood used for the project shall meet
or exceed the standards established in "BMPs of the Use of Treated Wood. in Aquatic
Environments" developed by the Western Wood Preservers Institute.
b. Minimization: No creosote wood would be used in the project. All wood
materials would meet or exceed the standards established in "BMPs for the Use of
Treated Wood in Aquatic Environments". The new decking material shall be untreated
wood.
The pier heights will be built as high above the high water line as possible
to allow for light mitigation below the pier. No fill discharges will take place
as part of this project. The project includes pier work only. No shoreline,
bulkhead, dredging or fill would take place as part of the project.
c.
Compensatory Mitigation: Compensatory mitigation is not practicable for
this project. The commercial pier serves as a hub for commerce to the region. The
overall size of the additions would be kept to a minimum but would still allow for
vessels to dock and load/unload safely. The overall scope of the work is being
completed as an improvement for economic development of the general region.
CULTURAL RESOURCES: The latest published version of the Alaska Heritage Resources
Survey (AHRS) has been consulted for the presence or absence of historic
properties, including those listed in or eligible for inclusion in the National
Register of Historic Places. There are no listed or eligible properties in the
vicinity of the worksite. However, the project area has been determined to be
within the Dutch Harbor Naval Operating Base and Fort Mears National Historic
Landmark, a determination of effect will be made in consultation with the State
Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and with the National Park Service. Any
comments the SHPO or NPS may have concerning presently unknown archeological or
historic data that may be lost or destroyed by work under the requested permit will
be ,considered in our final assessment of the described work.
-2-
ENDANGERED SPECIES: The project site is within the known or historic range of the
northern sea otter (Enhydra lutris), Steller's eider (Polystict~ stelleri), and the
Steller sea-lion (Eumetopias jubatus). The project is also within the area
designated as critical habitat for northern sea otter. We have determined the
described activity will not affect the species listed above, or designated critical
habitat, under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. (87 Stat. 844).
ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT: The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management
Act, as amended by the Sustainable Fisheries Act of 1996, requires all Federal
agencies to consult with the NMFS on all actions, or proposed actions, permitted,
funded, or undertaken by the agency, that may adversely affect Essential Fish
Habitat (EFH). The project area is within the known range of pink salmon
(Oncorhynchus gorbuscha), chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta), coho salmon (Oncorhynchus
kisutch), sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka), chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus
tshawytscha) and weathervane scallops (Patinopecten caurinus). We are currently
gathering information regarding these species and have yet to make a determination
of effect.
Should we find that the described activity may affect the species listed
above, we will follow the appropriate course of action under Section 305(b) (2) of
the Magnuson-Stevens Act. Any comments the National Marine Fisheries Service may
have concerning essential fish habitat will be considered in our final assessment of
the described work.
TRIBAL CONSULTATION: The Alaska District fully supports tribal self-governance and
government-to-government relations between Federally recognized Tribes and the
Federal government. Tribes with protected rights or resources that could be
significantly affected by a proposed Federal action (e.g., a permit decision) have
the right to consult with the Alaska District on a government-to-government basis.
Views of each Tribe regarding protected rights and resources will be accorded due
consideration in this process. This Public Notice serves as notification to the
Tribes within the area potentially affected by the proposed work and invites their
participation in the Federal decision-making process regarding the protected Tribal
right or resource.
Consultation may be initiated by the affected Tribe upon
written request to the District Commander during the public comment period.
PUBLIC HEARING: Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period
specified in this notice, that a public hearing be held to consider this
application. Requests for p~blic hearings shall state, with particularity, reasons
for holding a public hearing.
EVALUATION: The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation
of the probable impacts, including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity and
its intended use on the public interest. Evaluation of the probable impacts, which
the proposed activity may have on the public interest, requires a careful weighing
of all the factors that become relevant in each particular case. The benefits,
which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal, must be balanced
against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. The outcome of the general
balancing process would determine whether to authorize a proposal, and if so, the
conditions under which it will be allowed to occur. The decision should reflect
the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources.
All factors, which may be relevant to the proposal, must be considered including
the cumulative effects thereof. Among those are conservation, economics,
aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and
wildlife values, flood hazards, floodplain values, land use, navigation, shore
erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality,
-3-
energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of
property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people.
For
activities involving 404 discharges, a permit will be denied if the discharge that
would be authorized by such permit would not comply with the Environmental
Protection Agency's 404(b) (1) guidelines.
Subject to the preceding sentence and
any other applicable guidelines or criteria (see Sections 320.2 and 320.3), a
permit will be granted unless the District Commander determines that it would be
contrary to the public interest.
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State, and
local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes; and other interested parties in order
to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments
received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to determine whether to
issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this
decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic
properties, water quality, general environmental effects, and the other public
interest factors listed above.
Comments are used in the preparation of an
Environmental Assessment and/or an Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the
National Environmental Policy Act. Comments are also used to determine the need
for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed
activity.
AUTHORITY:
This permit will be issued or denied under the following authority:
(X)
Perform work in or affecting navigable waters of the United States Section 10 Rivers and Harbors Act 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403).
Project drawings are enclosed with this Public Notice.
District Commander
U.S. Army, Corps of Engineers
Enclosures
-4-
'i\
PR'OJECT INFORMATION
SITE MAP
OWNER:
COASTAL TRANSPORTATION, INC.
---',,~~~~;";::~~~~
...
~ ~~
~.",,,y".'·C".
~~~,~~':
DRAWINGS BY:
ECCO DESIGN INC.
203 N 36TH ST SUITE 201
SEATILE, WA 98103
206-706- 3937
SITE ADDRESS:
EAST POINT ROAD, DUTCH HARBOR AK
ATS 1073 - PLAT 79-5
UNALASKA, AK
BODY OF WATER:
ILiULlUK BAY 16
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 73S, RANGE 118W, S.M. ATS
1073 RECORDED AS PLAT 79-5
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
A new 57' x 50' & 10' x 181'-0" (approx. 4480sf)
pile-supported pier section will be added to the
northern end of the eXisting pier. A new 82' x 66'
(approx. 4485sf) pile supported pier section will be
added to the southern end of the eXisting pier. All
construction materials will be a combination of
treated wood, wood/steel piles alld untreated
decking. All work will be conducted from the upland
side using a crane for pile driving. Work will be
conducted during daylight hours only. All materials
will be on site prior to commencment of work.
Construction should be complete in approximately 4
months.
PURPOSE: Boat Moorage
DATUM:
u.s.c. a G.S.
ADJACENT PROPERTY
OWNERS:
1. Ounalaska Corp.
2. Queen Fisheries
NAME: Coastal Transportation, Inc.
REFERENCE
#: POA-1976-83-M5
SITE LOCATION ADDRESS:
East Point Road
Dutch Harbor, AK
PROPOSED: Pier Extension
IN: Iliuliuk Bay
AT: Unalaska, AK
SHEET 1 of 13
DATE: April 5, 2012
LotlA
East Point Estates
ExIst.
Wood
Plor
IIi u I i u k
Bay
z
;;0
::r:
n
~SITE PLAN
1" = 100'-0"
\
\
COASTAL TRA NSPORTATION, INC. (C.T.I.)
Lot 2
--- ----
-I
POA-1976-83-MS
Applicant·
File No.:' Coa st al Transportation Inc.
Waterway: Iliuliuk Bay
~roposed activity: (dock)
ec.3 T.73S
R
Lat.: 53"52'49.37" 118SW S.M.
Sheet 2 of 13
Long.: 166°32'20.56"W
Date: 4/5/2012
N
SCOPE OF WORK·
Install (4) pile w~od dolphin
OVERALL PIER EXTENSIC N
APPROX. 4485SF+/I
'~4X 12 DECKING
"~CONT.
BULL RAIL
Wt::::::::::~::::::::::~==::::::;;==~~~;:=::::::::::;;::~~~:::I~;},: ::
CUS:M FABRICA:D STEEL BITt!)
TIE.DOWN. ATTACH TO PILE 8: CAP
BELOW, TYP.
SOUTH PIER
1/16"
POA-1976-83-MS
Applicant: Coastal Transportation Inc.
File No.:
Waterway: Iliuliuk Bay
Proposed activity: (dock)
Sec. 3 T. 73S R. 118SW S.M.
Lat.: 53°52'49.37" N
Long.: 166°32'20.56'W
Sheet 3 of 13
Date: 4/6/2012
= 1'-0"
~
-
(!)
~
®~~:INSTALL
FENDER PILE·
APPROX 10' O.c,
PLAN
.
~
(4) PILE
WOOD DOLPHIN
EXTENSION
;..,
"'1/'--_ _ _ _ _ _ _ 54' 3"+/ (FIELD VERIFY) _ _------c;------'7-t
1~~~~~~~~\1,-.,_ _ _---+I
II
r
I
T.
,I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I}..··
II
II
I
I
'.\
1
\
\\
bl.11.-------~----,lI.-------___,*_I--~~-_+_-I*_--___,;~.\.
Ii
·
·
i
·
i
!.~\
V
v~
~=======t======j=======t======j=====t=t======jT=~~,.
I
~
'I
1
1
~I---~---~---~I--~--~---I--~--~~\/'
·
·
-.
·
..
I
II
I
I
I
I
T
T
T
T
T
1
,
I
..
~,
1 ~I___~__~___~I__~,~T__+-~T_____+-___\~~\,
I
~
q
Ei
~
'=t::!
-<
I i ,\
i
\\
~
~--____It-------4I~--~----'--""--+-~-------tI~--____
.1.,i,\.-~>k-
I
I
I
T
~
~
~
~
T'.;
/
rPIER PILES - (12 TOTAL):
MIN. 12" DIA. STANDARD STEEL PIPE PILESEVERY 10'+/- (EXTERIOR ROW OF PILES ONLY)
I
'\' ~
I i '\
f
' \\
/FENDER PILES - (9 TOTAL)
I
I
I
V
~~=====~~======~~=====~~======~~====~=!======~T~======~==~\~,
~'------'-7---~'----~'-------='~--+---!-'-------='f----+-'-2J<
I.
I
1
I
I
II
I
I
I
T
H - - - - - i f - - - - - f - - - { )-+------i-----+---1,-<)L
®
~~
®
PIER PILES - (47 TOTAL):
16"ACZATREATED-EVERY10'+/-
~
W'
i
I
®
16" ACZA TREATED FENDER
PILE - EVERY 10'+/-
1'.\
1/\
.,/ / /'.\\\
(.r
W:----'r
~ INSTALL ADDITIONAL 12" DIA. STANDARD St(:EL
PIPE PILE @ EACH TIE-DOWN ANCHOR
:«)
LOCATION - COORDINATE WITH OWNERS ON
'<
110'-0" (BENT TYPQ),O" (6X12 SPREADER TYP.)
;?---_ _--'-_-'-----_ _ _ _ _ _ _81'-10"+I-
SOUTH PIER
POA-1976-83-M5
1/16"
= 1'-0"
Applicant: Coastal Transportation Inc.
File No.:
Waterway: Iliuliuk Bay
Proposed activity: (dock)
Sec.3 T.73S
R.118SW S.M.
Lat.: 53" 52'49.37" N
Long.: 166 32'20. 56"W
Sheet: 4 of 13
Date: 4/612012
0
(FiELD
VERI~_C_T_L_OC_A_T_IO_N_S_ _ _ _ _ _,1<'
FRAMING
PLAN
EXTENSION
FENDER PILE. BEYOND
12 X 12 BULL RAIL
4 X 12 DECKING (ELEV.13.5
TO MATCH EXISTING)
MHHW 3.4'
MHHW 3.4'
=
MLLWOI.O
I
" :1111·
1111
:1111
1111
1111== In
SEC T ION C-C
1/16" = 1'-0"
POA-1976-83-MS
Applicant: Coastal Transportation Inc.
File No.:
Waterway: Iliuliuk Bay
Proposed activity: (dock)
Sec. 3 T. 73S R. 118SW S.M.
Lat.: 53°52'49.37" N
Long.: 166°32'20.56'W
Sheet: 5 of 13
Date: 4/6/2012 Revised: 5/22/2012
I - 111=
SEC T ION B-B
1116"
= 1'-0"
-II
1" DIA. BOLT
12x12 BULL RAIL
12X 12 END
STRINGER
6 X 12 @ 24"O.C.
A
1" DIA. BOLT @
48"O.C.
EDGE ElEVATION@SOUTH PIER
1/2"
= 1'-0"
12 X 14 CAP BEAM
....
B
.-
END SECTION
1/2"
POA-1976-83-MS
Applicant: Coastal Transportation Inc.
File No.:
Waterway: lliuliuk Bay
Proposed activity: (dock)
Sec. 3 T. 73S
R. 118SW S.M ..
Lat.: 53·52'49.37" N
Long.: 166·32'20.56'W
Sheet: 6 of 13
Date: 4/6/2012
= 1'-0"·
@ SOUTH
PIER
5T·rr.. /·(F.V.)
mr-mTA"Tfm'R1rffmm"lTFFt- - - - -,
6X12 SPREADER BEAM·
,fAL.
LEIf if@20'O,C.TYP. L
-
.
~~N::.: -
- - - - - - - - - - - - -'- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -,.- -/7
(APRQX. 59'2QSF .. /-)
/
/
/
/
/
/
NORTH PIER FRAMING
1/32"
PLAN
EXTENSION
= 1'-0"
11PIER EXTENSIOlE: ==
l'IE=3li!APIPIROIXI'I44180ISIF+I/_II~il'~1111111111111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~!I.
1
!
I
!~OVERALL
t
!
~cUSTOM FABRICATED STEa Brr
TIE-DOWN - TYP. 40' o.c·· ,· A.TTACH
TO PILE ft CAP aaow, TYP.
NORTH PIER
1/32"
= 1'-0"
POA-1976-83-MS
Applicant: Coastal Transportation Inc.
FileNo.:
Waterway: Iliuliuk Bay
Proposed activity: (dock)
Sec. 3 T.73S
R.118SW S.M.
Lat.: 53"52'49.37" N
Long.: 166°32'20.56'W
Sheet: 7 of 13
Date: 4/6/2012
PLAN
~FENDER PILE· EVERY 10'.. '·
EXTENSION
FENDER PILE
(APPROX. 10'
O.C,)
l"DIA. BOLT
12x12 BULL RAIL
4x12 BLKG.
PL 1/4X 12 X 1'·6" NS
o
o
o
o
II
II
II
II
II
II
12x12 BULL RAIL
a FS
4x12 BLKG.
D
STEEL PILE
EDGE ELEVATION
1/2"
= 1'-0"
6 X 12 @24"0.C.
1" DIA. BOLT@48"0.C.
12 X 14 CAP BEAM
c
P I liN G
1/2" = 1'-0"
CON NEe T ION - WOOD
POA-1976-83-M5
Applicant: Coastal Transportation Inc.
File No.:
Waterway: lliuliuk Bay
Proposed activity: (dock)
Sec.3 T.73S
R. 118SW S.M.
Lat.: 53°52'49.37" N
Long.: 166°32'20.56"W
Sheet: 8 of 13
Date: 4/6/2012
: 0-0 BET WEE N
1/2" = 1'-0"
P Il E S - WOOD
4x12 DECK
4" X 14" X 6'-0"
SPLICE PLATE
AV90}JIHL
A}J3A3 >1)019
nX9;10 ~#Ld
3/4"THRU
BOLTS, TYP,
~_-,---
@
II
II
II
II @
II
I
II.
II
II
II
II
II
@
i--.-,.."T-F=r---j
@
30d GALY. TOE
NAILS@6"0.C.
BOTH SIDES
@
@
.3
~t ~ ~ ~
I
==1:
I
I
==1:
I
1--1
l"DIA,
GALY.
BOLT, TYP.
SUB PILE CAP
~J===-
3/4' GALV.
·
BOt"
14"-16" DIA. Bun TREATED PILE
F
POA-1976-83-M5
Applicant: Coastal Transportation Inc.
File No.:
Waterway: /liuliuk Bay
Proposed activity: (dock)
Sec. 3 T.73S R.118SW S.M.
Lat.: 53°52'49.37" N
Long.: 166°32'20.56"W
Sheet: 9 of 13
Date: 4/6/2012
PILING
1/2"
= 1'-0"
CAP
SPLICE
SECTION
F-F
EXIST. BULL RAIL
TO BE REMOVED ""\.. ~ ~ ,- - -/~ ~
(E)4x12
.
(E) 4x12
DECK
V
~~---~1
I'
/
r
'/
t
I
/x,
I
I
~~
/
DECK
EXIST. BULL RAIL
TO BE REMOVED
~
'x/
: /
"
NEW PT DF 4 X 12 DECK
:
I
.-: ___ '::J
h---.--------.---l.I-k-----.I--...,r---r------:::1- NEW PT #1
DF 6
X 12 @ 24"0.C.
'I
___ '::J
NEW PT #1 DF
12X 14
(E) 4x1fj@
24" O.c.
NEW FB 3/8 X 4 X
2'·0" @6··0"'0.C.
ONE FACE WI (4)
3/4" DIA. BOLTS
NEW 1" DIA. BOLTS
@24"'0.C.
(E) 12 X 18
DOCK CONNECTION
(E) TIMBER
PILE
NEW I 0 l D - STEEL PILE I TIMBER CAP
1/2"
POA-1976-83-MS
Applicant: Coastal Transportation Inc.
File No.:
Waterway: Iliuliuk Bay
Proposed activity: (dock)
Sec.3 T.73S
R. 118SW S.M.
Lat.: 53"52'49.37" N
Long.: 166°32'20.56'W
Sheet: 10 of 13
Date: 4/6/2012
= 1'-0"
·
EXIST. BULL RAIL
, __ - __ 1
TO BE REMOVED """'\..:',
// I
(E) 4x12
DECK
~
,,/
I
/x,
NEW PT OF 4 X 12 DECK
I
I
I /
'I
~~ ___ ~J
. 4x12 DECK
FULL DEPTH PT #1 OF
6 X 12 BLOCK EVERY
THIRD BAY
NEW PT #1 DF
6X12 @ 24"0.C.
h--.------.--I:--+::.:----,F-irr--=::::::r-- NEW PT #1 OF 6
12@24"0.C.
FB 3/8 X 4' X 2'-0" BOTH
SIDES. ATTACH WI (4)
3/4" DIA BOLTS
(E) TIMBER
PILE
NEWPT #1 OF
12X 14
NEW TIMBER PILEPROVIDE TYPICAL CAP
CONNECTION
- TIMBER PILE I TIMBER CAP
SIMPSON HSA68 USE (8) 3/4" DIA.
BOLTS
IJ \
SPREADER BEAM CON N. TIMBER CAP
1/2"
POA-1976-83-M5
Applicant: Coastal Transportation Inc.
File No.:
Waterway: lliuliuk Bay
Proposed activity: (dock)
Sec.3 T.73S
R. 118SW S.M.
Lat.: 53"52'49.37" N
Long.: 166°32'20.56"W
Sheet: 11 of 13
Date: 4/6/2012
SIMPSON HW612 GALV.
12 X 14 CAP BEAM
/---...."
\,,__"/J
NEW PT #1 DF 6X12
SPREADER BEAM
= 1'-0"
PL 1/4 X 12 X 1'-6" NS & FS
(4) 7/S"
OIA. BOLT
·YO"YZ ® Z~X9
dO ~#.ld M3N
NEW PT #1 OF 6X12
SPREADER BEAM
SPREADER BEAM CON N. ONE SIDE - TIMBER CAP
S TEE l PI lET 0 WOO D CAP CON N.
112" = 1'-0"
2··S'·
J.,:
V
1
PL 1 1/4" X 32 X 32
1
0
0
--- ....
/
0
--- .....
PILE BELOW
I
PL 32· SQR.
11/4"THICK
0
T
~
1/2"
I __+--~,..-rll-="'" 1 X 14 CAP
0
1 1/2" OIA. BOLTS
A307 OR 1 1IS·' OIA
A325n (6) TOTAL
E - DOW NAN C H 0 R - PLAN VIEW
= 1'-0"
PL 1 1/4·· X 32 X 32
.
5/16
STEEL PILES
POA-1976-83-M5
Applicant: Coastal Transportation Inc.
File No.:
Waterway: Iliuliuk Bay
Proposed activity: (dock)
Sec.3 T. 73S R. 118SW S.M.
Lat.: 53°52'49.37" N
Long.: 166°32'20.56'W
Sheet: 12 of 13
Date: 4/6/2012
TIE - DOW NAN C H 0 R '" SECTION
1/2"
=
1'-0"
·
STRUCTURAL NOTES
General Notes:
These structural notes supplement the drawings. Any discrepancy found among the drawings,
these notes, and the site conditions shall be reported to the Engineer, who shall correct such
discrepancy in writing. Any work done by the Contractor after discovery of such discrepancy shall
be done at the Contractor's risk. The Contractor shall verify and coordinate the dimensions
among all drawings prior to proceeding with any work or fabrication. The Contractor is
responsible foraH bracing and shoring during construction.
All construction shall conform to the applicable portions of the latest edition of the International
Building Code except where noted.
Design Criteria:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Dead Load
Live Load
Wind Load
Seismic Zone
Moored Boat
Load Combinations:
1.
2.
3.
4.
=
=
=
=
25 PSF
=
250 PSF
130 MPH, Exposure 0 wind to boat.
Ss = 1.61
300' long with 30' of height above water line.
Dead + Live + 75% Wind
Dead + 10% Live + Wind
All steel plate and angles shall be ASTM A36 except as noted.
All steel pipe piles shall be ASTM A-53 Type S.
Welding shall be by certified welders with E70 electrodes in accordance with
AWS 01.1-75.
All steel members and parts exposed to weather or in contact with the ground
shall be galvanized per ASTM A-123 with 1.25 oz. of zinc spelter per square
foot of contact area. All other steel surfaces shall be shop painted with two
coats of red oxide primer after fabrication.
Pipe... Piles:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Piles shall be 12 inch diameter standard weight pipes. Pipes shall be
galvanized.
Pipe piles shall be driven to a vertical capacity of 20 Tons, with a minimum
embedment of 12"
Structural pipe shall be ASTM A53 type S.
Welding shall be by certified welders with E70 electrodes in accordance with
AWS 01.1-75.
~
~
ll'!N
0"NO
· N
Carpentry:
N .......
M",
1.
2.
Structural framing shall be Chemonite treated #1 Doug-Fir.
Timber piles shall be 14" to 16" "diameter pressure treated Doug-Fir piles,
driven to a 20 Ton capacity with a minimum of 12' ofembedment.
Hardware:
All connection hardware shall be Simpson "Strong Tie". Connection hardware exposed to the
weather or soil shall be treated as in steel above.
CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS AND ALL ELEVATIONS.
U
..5
c
o
~o
a.
~
I-
........
~...,.