Home

Little Rock District

Run scraper

Pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S. Code 1344)

Basic information

Fill out these two fields at minimum.

— or —

How Big?

Where?

Links to source documents

Raw text

You can copy from here when filling out the rest of the page.

Pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S. Code 1344), notice is hereby given that the, Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department (AHTD, PO Box 2261, Little Rock, Arkansas 72203, has requested authorization for the placement of dredged and fill material in waters of the United States associated with constructing the first segment of the Springdale Bypass. The proposed project (first segment) begins just north of Elm Springs at State Highway 112 and ends at existing Interstate 540 near Bethel Heights, in sections 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 19, T. 18 N., R. 30 W., and in sections 13 and 24, T. 18 N., R. 31 W., Benton County, Arkansas. Total length of the project is approximately 4.5 miles.

The basic purpose of the project is to provide safe and efficient movement of traffic within the region while accommodating through and intermodal travelers and alleviating congestion along local roadways. The overall purpose of the project is to upgrade the U.S. Highway 412 corridor. When the entire bypass is completed, it will become U.S. Highway 412, and extend from west of Tontitown to east of Sonora on the north side of Springdale. The project is not water dependent, and an extensive alternative analysis was completed as part of the environmental impact statement (EIS).

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Comments are invited on the work described below. Please see the Public Involvement section for details on submitting comments. Point of Contact. If additional information is desired, please contact the project manager, Johnny McLean, telephone number: (501) 324-5295, mailing address: Little Rock District Corps of Engineers, Regulatory Division, PO Box 867, Little Rock, Arkansas 72203‑0867, email address: Johnny.L.McLean@usace.army.mil Project Information. Pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S. Code 1344), notice is hereby given that the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department (AHTD) PO Box 2261 Little Rock, Arkansas 72203 has requested authorization for the placement of dredged and fill material in waters of the United States associated with constructing the first segment of the Springdale Bypass. The proposed project (first segment) begins just north of Elm Springs at State Highway 112 and ends at existing Interstate 540 near Bethel Heights, in sections 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 19, T. 18 N., R. 30 W., and in sections 13 and 24, T. 18 N., R. 31 W., Benton County, Arkansas. Total length of the project is approximately 4.5 miles. The basic purpose of the project is to provide safe and efficient movement of traffic within the region while accommodating through and intermodal travelers and alleviating congestion along local roadways. The overall purpose of the project is to upgrade the U.S. Highway 412 corridor. When the entire bypass is completed, it will become U.S. Highway 412, and extend from west of Tontitown to east of Sonora on the north side of Springdale. The project is not water dependent, and an extensive alternative analysis was completed as part of the environmental impact statement (EIS). The proposed project would involve construction of a four-lane, fully controlled access highway on new location. The new highway would have two 12-foot-wide travel lanes in each direction separated by a variable width median. The project would cross Spring Creek, Puppy Creek and four unnamed tributaries. Spring Creek and Puppy Creek will be spanned with bridges. Both streams would be temporarily impacted by the construction of work roads. A total of 511 cubic yards of temporary rock fill would be discharged below the ordinary high water mark of Spring Creek. A total of 66 cubic yards of temporary rock fill would be discharged below the ordinary high water mark of Puppy Creek. The Spring Creek and Puppy Creek crossings are denoted as numbers 12 and 14 on the enclosed location maps. Culverts would be constructed in the four unnamed tributaries and construction would require the permanent relocation of approximately 1,745 linear feet of streams. The relocations would consist of a mix of filling and piping the stream channels to align them perpendicular to the roadway. Spring Creek and Puppy Creek are perennial streams located in the Illinois River watershed. They are moderately functional streams with medium-to-high values. Spring Creek is the largest stream impacted by the project and it flows into Osage Creek approximately two miles west of the project. One of the unnamed tributaries is ephemeral and the remaining three are intermittent streams. The unnamed tributaries have been impacted in the past and are considered functionally impaired with low-to-medium values. None of the impacted streams are classified as Ecologically Sensitive Waters or Ecologically Sensitive Waterbodies; however, the proposed project will require Section 401 individual water quality certification from the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) due to the extent of the impacts. There are no wetland impacts associated with this project. The EIS for the bypass was completed on October 6, 2005, and is available for viewing at the AHTD Central Offices in Little Rock. The EIS identified multiple cultural/historical sites in the project area; however, only two were eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. Phase III data recovery will take place on these two sites beginning in the fall of 2014. The EIS also identified 25 residential properties, 9 rental properties, 3 businesses, and 2 farms that would have to be relocated as a result of the project. During the planning stages, an attempt was made to design the project to cross the headwater segments of each unnamed tributary, avoid relocatees and maintain interstate grade design standards at the same time. In addition to the no-build alternative, the EIS evaluated four alternative alignments. Minimization was accomplished by bridging Spring Creek and Puppy Creek, and crossing the unnamed tributaries near their headwater locations. The Little Rock District Stream Method was used to assess stream impacts and required mitigation. The Method determined that a total of 6,511 stream credits would be required for mitigation. The AHTD has agreed to mitigate for all stream impacts. The AHTD proposes to purchase stream mitigation credits from an approved bank in the Elk River watershed or the Illinois River watershed. A copy of the stream evaluation worksheet is enclosed. The location and general plan for the proposed work are shown on the enclosed sheets 1 through 6 of 7. Water Quality Certification. By copy of this public notice, the applicant is requesting water quality certification from ADEQ in accordance with Section 401(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act. Upon completion of the comment period and a public hearing, if held, a determination relative to water quality certification will be made. Evidence of this water quality certification or waiver of the right to certify must be submitted prior to the issuance of a Corps of Engineers permit. Cultural Resources. In addition to the EIS analysis, a Corps staff archeologist will review topographic maps, the National Register of Historic Places, and other data on reported sites in the area. The District Engineer invites responses to this public notice from Native American Nations or tribal governments; Federal, State, and local agencies; historical and archeological societies; and other parties likely to have knowledge of or concerns with historic properties in the area. Endangered Species. Our preliminary determination is that the proposed activity will not affect listed Endangered Species or their critical habitat. A copy of this notice is being furnished to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and appropriate state agencies and constitutes a request to those agencies for information on whether any listed or proposed‑to‑be‑listed endangered or threatened species may be present in the area which would be affected by the proposed activity. Flood Plain. We are providing copies of this notice to appropriate flood plain officials in accordance with 44 CFR Part 60 (Flood Plain Management Regulations Criteria for Land Management and Use) and Executive Order 11988 on Flood Plain Management. Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines. The evaluation of activities to be authorized under this permit which involves the discharge of dredged or fill material will include application of guidelines promulgated by the Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, under authority of Section 404(b) of the Clean Water Act. These guidelines are contained in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 230. Public Involvement. Any interested party is invited to submit to the above-listed POC written comments or objections relative to the proposed work on or before October 17, 2014. Substantive comments, both favorable and unfavorable, will be accepted and made a part of the record and will receive full consideration in determining whether this work would be in the public interest. The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impact including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity on the public interest. That decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefit which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal will be considered including the cumulative effects thereof; among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, historic properties, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, flood plain values, land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, state, and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes; and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects, and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment and/or an Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act. Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity. Any person may request in writing within the comment period specified in this notice that a public hearing be held to consider this application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing. The District Engineer will determine if the issues raised are substantial and whether a hearing is needed for making a decision. NOTE: The mailing list for this Public Notice is arranged by state and county(s) where the project is located, and also includes any addressees who have asked to receive copies of all public notices. Please discard notices that are not of interest to you. If you have no need for any of these notices, please advise us so that your name can be removed from the mailing list. Enclosures Approximate Coordinates of Project Center Latitude: 36.231120 Longitude: -94.203515 UTM Zone: 15 Northing: 4010254 Easting: 391844

JOINT PUBLIC NOTICE US Army Corps of Engineers® Little Rock District

CORPS OF ENGINEERS ­ STATE OF ARKANSAS Application Number: SWL 2014-00328 Date: September 22, 2014 Comments Due: October 17, 2014

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Comments are invited on the work described below. Please see the Public Involvement section for details on submitting comments. Point of Contact. If additional information is desired, please contact the project manager, Johnny McLean, telephone number: (501) 324-5295, mailing address: Little Rock District Corps of Engineers, Regulatory Division, PO Box 867, Little Rock, Arkansas 72203-0867, email address: Johnny.L.McLean@usace.army.mil. Project Information. Pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S. Code 1344), notice is hereby given that the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department (AHTD) PO Box 2261 Little Rock, Arkansas 72203 has requested authorization for the placement of dredged and fill material in waters of the United States associated with constructing the first segment of the Springdale Bypass. The proposed project (first segment) begins just north of Elm Springs at State Highway 112 and ends at existing Interstate 540 near Bethel Heights, in sections 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 19, T. 18 N., R. 30 W., and in sections 13 and 24, T. 18 N., R. 31 W., Benton County, Arkansas. Total length of the project is approximately 4.5 miles. The basic purpose of the project is to provide safe and efficient movement of traffic within the region while accommodating through and intermodal travelers and alleviating congestion along local roadways. The overall purpose of the project is to upgrade the U.S. Highway 412 corridor. When the entire bypass is completed, it will become U.S. Highway 412, and extend from west of Tontitown to east of Sonora on the north side of Springdale. The project is not water dependent, and an extensive alternative analysis was completed as part of the environmental impact statement (EIS). The proposed project would involve construction of a four-lane, fully controlled access highway on new location. The new highway would have two 12-foot-wide travel lanes in each direction separated by a variable width median. The project would cross Spring Creek, Puppy Creek and four unnamed tributaries. Spring Creek and Puppy Creek will be spanned with bridges. Both streams would be temporarily impacted by the construction of work roads. A total of 511 cubic yards of temporary rock fill would be discharged below the ordinary high water mark of Spring Creek. A total of 66 cubic yards of temporary rock fill would be discharged below the ordinary high water mark of Puppy Creek. The Spring Creek and Puppy Creek crossings are denoted as numbers 12 and 14 on the enclosed location maps. Culverts would be constructed in the four unnamed tributaries and construction would require the permanent relocation of approximately -1-

1,745 linear feet of streams. The relocations would consist of a mix of filling and piping the stream channels to align them perpendicular to the roadway. Spring Creek and Puppy Creek are perennial streams located in the Illinois River watershed. They are moderately functional streams with medium-to-high values. Spring Creek is the largest stream impacted by the project and it flows into Osage Creek approximately two miles west of the project. One of the unnamed tributaries is ephemeral and the remaining three are intermittent streams. The unnamed tributaries have been impacted in the past and are considered functionally impaired with low-to-medium values. None of the impacted streams are classified as Ecologically Sensitive Waters or Ecologically Sensitive Waterbodies; however, the proposed project will require Section 401 individual water quality certification from the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) due to the extent of the impacts. There are no wetland impacts associated with this project. The EIS for the bypass was completed on October 6, 2005, and is available for viewing at the AHTD Central Offices in Little Rock. The EIS identified multiple cultural/historical sites in the project area; however, only two were eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. Phase III data recovery will take place on these two sites beginning in the fall of 2014. The EIS also identified 25 residential properties, 9 rental properties, 3 businesses, and 2 farms that would have to be relocated as a result of the project. During the planning stages, an attempt was made to design the project to cross the headwater segments of each unnamed tributary, avoid relocatees and maintain interstate grade design standards at the same time. In addition to the no-build alternative, the EIS evaluated four alternative alignments. Minimization was accomplished by bridging Spring Creek and Puppy Creek, and crossing the unnamed tributaries near their headwater locations. The Little Rock District Stream Method was used to assess stream impacts and required mitigation. The Method determined that a total of 6,511 stream credits would be required for mitigation. The AHTD has agreed to mitigate for all stream impacts. The AHTD proposes to purchase stream mitigation credits from an approved bank in the Elk River watershed or the Illinois River watershed. A copy of the stream evaluation worksheet is enclosed. The location and general plan for the proposed work are shown on the enclosed sheets 1 through 6 of 7. Water Quality Certification. By copy of this public notice, the applicant is requesting water quality certification from ADEQ in accordance with Section 401(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act. Upon completion of the comment period and a public hearing, if held, a determination relative to water quality certification will be made. Evidence of this water quality certification or waiver of the right to certify must be submitted prior to the issuance of a Corps of Engineers permit. Cultural Resources. In addition to the EIS analysis, a Corps staff archeologist will review topographic maps, the National Register of Historic Places, and other data on reported sites in the area. The District Engineer invites responses to this public notice from Native American Nations or tribal governments; Federal, State, and local agencies; historical and archeological

-2-

societies; and other parties likely to have knowledge of or concerns with historic properties in the area. Endangered Species. Our preliminary determination is that the proposed activity will not affect listed Endangered Species or their critical habitat. A copy of this notice is being furnished to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and appropriate state agencies and constitutes a request to those agencies for information on whether any listed or proposed-to-be-listed endangered or threatened species may be present in the area which would be affected by the proposed activity. Flood Plain. We are providing copies of this notice to appropriate flood plain officials in accordance with 44 CFR Part 60 (Flood Plain Management Regulations Criteria for Land Management and Use) and Executive Order 11988 on Flood Plain Management. Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines. The evaluation of activities to be authorized under this permit which involves the discharge of dredged or fill material will include application of guidelines promulgated by the Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, under authority of Section 404(b) of the Clean Water Act. These guidelines are contained in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 230. Public Involvement. Any interested party is invited to submit to the above-listed POC written comments or objections relative to the proposed work on or before October 17, 2014. Substantive comments, both favorable and unfavorable, will be accepted and made a part of the record and will receive full consideration in determining whether this work would be in the public interest. The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impact including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity on the public interest. That decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefit which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal will be considered including the cumulative effects thereof; among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, historic properties, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, flood plain values, land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, state, and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes; and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects, and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment and/or an Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act. Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity.

-3-

Any person may request in writing within the comment period specified in this notice that a public hearing be held to consider this application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing. The District Engineer will determine if the issues raised are substantial and whether a hearing is needed for making a decision. NOTE: The mailing list for this Public Notice is arranged by state and county(s) where the project is located, and also includes any addressees who have asked to receive copies of all public notices. Please discard notices that are not of interest to you. If you have no need for any of these notices, please advise us so that your name can be removed from the mailing list. Enclosures Approximate Coordinates of Project Center Latitude: 36.231120 UTM Zone: 15

Longitude: -94.203515

Northing: 4010254

Easting: 391844

-4-

Ford

Clayton

Sand

Ma in

s as Gl

Dune

Sherman

Pape r

Brown

Peak Ravine

er igl Ze

he el R

Drake

Wa go nW

ay Cl

Kelly

Miller

12

rd Co

3 Pipes Total 850' of Stream Relocation UTM NAD83 Easting: 389695.515821 Northing: 4009829.27946

oa d

Bridge UTM NAD83 Easting: 391845.192858 Northing: 4010255.45871 Bridg eton

b ins Rob

Grimsley

9 10 11

Marchant

Ball

Downum

Amy

Area Portrayed

Hillbil

Pinkley

Lancelot

Deek

Carrie Smith

County Line

0

750

1,500

Feet

Springdale 1982 USGS TOPO August 15, 2014 AHTD - Environmental GIS - DeMasi

Project No. SWL 2014-00328 Job CA0907 Ark. Hwy. & Transportation Dept. Hwy. 112 - I-540 (Hwy. 412) Springdale Bypass - First Segment Benton County Benton County near Elm Springs Sheet 1 of 2 September 2014 Sheet 1 of 7

Stream Crossing DPH Selected Alignment Alternative DPH Selected Alignment Alternative ROW

Commerce

Flo ren ce

Sic ily

Zion

Federal

Ladelle

Sims

13

16 Graham

Zion

15

Burrell

14

Knight

Goad Springs

Box 300' Stream Relocation UTM NAD83 Easting: 396149.811126 Northing: 4011291.83108

Willard

Barrett

Sprin g Creek

Bridge Sand pipe r UTM NAD83 Billie Acres Easting: 395104.008244 Northing: 4011229.27119

Pipe 375' Stream Relocation UTM NAD83 Easting: 394180.672132 Northing: 4011026.70037

Sharp Springs

Pupp y Creek

d nra Co

Bridge 220' Stream Relocation Secretariat UTM NAD83 Easting: 396257.643502 Northing: 4011139.92436

Charismatic

Pu pp y

Wild woo d

Cr

ee k

Sue

Wagon Wheel

t

es Cr

Essex

gle Ea

Whispering Spring

Sprin ghill

Looney

Bel A ir

0

750

1,500

Feet

Springdale 1982 USGS TOPO August 15, 2014 AHTD - Environmental GIS - DeMasi

40th

56th

48th

Hillbilly

Job CA0907 Hwy. 112 - I-540 (Hwy. 412) Benton County Sheet 2 of 2

Waverly

Area Portrayed

Adel

Pump Sta tion

Stultz

Twin Oaks

49

Silent Grove

Georg e

Stream Crossing

DPH Selected Alignment Alternative

DPH Selected Alignment Alternative ROW

Sheet 2 of 7

Rough impact

We use the fields in this section to decide whether to conduct an in-depth review.

Permit Manager

Dates

Identity numbers

Permits, certifications, and locations related to this particular notice

History of edits

Data are available as CSV download in the following schemas